| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In a future patch, mlxsw will start adding RIFs to uppers of front panel
port netdevices, if they have an IP address.
At the time that the front panel port is enslaved to the bridge (this holds
for all bridges used here), the bridge MAC address does not have the same
prefix as other interfaces in the system. On Nvidia Spectrum-1 machines all
the RIFs have to have the same 38-bit MAC address prefix. Since the bridge
does not obey this limitation, the RIF cannot be created, and the
enslavement attempt is vetoed on the grounds of the configuration not being
offloadable.
The selftest itself however checks whether a different vetoed aspect of the
configuration provides an extack. The IP address or the RIF are irrelevant.
Fix by disabling automatic IPv6 address generation for the HW-offloaded
bridges in this selftest, thus exempting them from mlxsw router attention.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
The driver supports a single VLAN-aware bridge. Test that the
enslavement of a port to the second VLAN-aware bridge fails with an
extack.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Test that creation of a bridge (both VLAN-aware and VLAN-unaware) fails
with an extack when a VXLAN device with an unsupported configuration is
already enslaved to it.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The addition of a VLAN on a bridge slave prompts the driver to have the
local port in question join the FID corresponding to this VLAN.
Before recent changes, the operation of joining the FID would also mean
that the driver would enable VXLAN tunneling if a VXLAN device was also
member in the VLAN. In case the configuration of the VXLAN tunnel was
not supported, an extack error would be returned.
Since the operation of joining the FID no longer means that VXLAN
tunneling is potentially enabled, the test is no longer relevant. Remove
it.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Test mapping a VLAN at a port device such that on the same VLAN, there
already is an unoffloadable VXLAN device.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Test mapping a VLAN at a VXLAN device that can't be offloaded.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Add a testsuite dedicated to testing extack propagation and related
functionality.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
