summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_general.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-06-09perf test trace: Change the regex pattern in the struct testHoward Chu
Ian mentioned a reliably occurred failure in the trace_btf_general test where he obtained trace output of: sleep/279619 clock_nanosleep(0, 0, {1,1,}, 0x7ffcd47b6450) = 0 But the regex pattern used for verification is "^sleep/[0-9]+ clock_nanosleep\(0, 0, \{1,\}, ..." This lead to a mismatch. The reason is, different sleep commands use different timespec data to call clock_nanosleep, on my machine, the value of tv_nsec is 0. ~~~ $ sudo /tmp/perf/perf trace -e clock_nanosleep -- sleep 1 0.000 (1000.196 ms): sleep/54261 clock_nanosleep(rqtp: { .tv_sec: 1, .tv_nsec: 0 }, rmtp: 0x7ffe13529550) = 0 ~~~ While Ian had this trace log: ~~~ $ sudo /tmp/perf/perf trace -e clock_nanosleep -- sleep 1 0.000 (1000.208 ms): sleep/1710732 clock_nanosleep(rqtp: { .tv_sec: 1, .tv_nsec: 1 }, rmtp: 0x7ffc091f4090) = 0 ~~~ Because sleep's behavior of setting 'tv_nsec' is not certain, and tv_sec is most definitely 1, this patch relaxes the key regex pattern to '\{1,.*\}' for a better chance of matching. Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com> Tested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250528191148.89118-7-howardchu95@gmail.com Reported-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2025-06-09perf test trace: Use --sort-events in BTF general testsHoward Chu
Without the '--sort-events' flag, perf trace doesn't receive and process events based on their arrival time, thus PERF_RECORD_COMM event that assigns the correct comm to a PID, may be delivered and processed after regular samples, causing trace outputs not having a 'comm', e.g. 'mv', instead, having the default PID placeholder, e.g. ':14514'. Hopefully this answers Namhyung's question in [1]. You can simply justify the statement with this diff: [2]. Now, simply run this command multiple times: $ touch /tmp/file1 && sudo /tmp/perf trace -e renameat* -- mv /tmp/file1 /tmp/file2 && rm -f /tmp/file2 And you should see two types of results: $ touch /tmp/file1 && sudo /tmp/perf trace -e renameat* -- mv /tmp/file1 /tmp/file2 && rm -f /tmp/file2 [debug] deliver [debug] machine__process_comm_event [OVERRIDE] old :1221169 new mv str mv [debug] deliver [debug] deliver [debug] deliver [debug] deliver [debug] deliver [debug] deliver [debug] deliver [debug] deliver [debug] deliver [debug] deliver 0.000 ( 0.013 ms): mv/1221169 renameat2(olddfd: CWD, oldname: "/tmp/file1", newdfd: CWD, newname: "/tmp/file2", flags: NOREPLACE) = 0 [debug] deliver $ touch /tmp/file1 && sudo /tmp/perf trace -e renameat* -- mv /tmp/file1 /tmp/file2 && rm -f /tmp/file2 [debug] deliver [debug] deliver [debug] deliver [debug] deliver [debug] deliver [debug] deliver [debug] deliver 0.000 ( 0.014 ms): :1221398/1221398 renameat2(olddfd: CWD, oldname: "/tmp/file1", newdfd: CWD, newname: "/tmp/file2", flags: NOREPLACE) = 0 [debug] deliver [debug] deliver [debug] machine__process_comm_event [OVERRIDE] old :1221398 new mv str mv [debug] deliver [debug] deliver [debug] deliver Anyway, use --sort-events in BTF general tests to avoid :PID, a comm is preferred. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/Z_AeswETE5xLcPT8@google.com/ [2]: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/Sberm/6b72b2a1cf1c62244f1f996481769baf/raw/529667bd74a2e7e1953bbd4be545bf875da8a3e7/unsorted.patch Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com> Tested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250528191148.89118-6-howardchu95@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2025-06-09perf test trace: Remove set -e for BTF general testsHoward Chu
Remove set -e and print error messages in BTF general tests. Before: $ sudo /tmp/perf test btf -vv 108: perf trace BTF general tests: 108: perf trace BTF general tests : Running --- start --- test child forked, pid 889299 Checking if vmlinux BTF exists Testing perf trace's string augmentation String augmentation test failed ---- end(-1) ---- 108: perf trace BTF general tests : FAILED! After: $ sudo /tmp/perf test btf -vv 108: perf trace BTF general tests: 108: perf trace BTF general tests : Running --- start --- test child forked, pid 886551 Checking if vmlinux BTF exists Testing perf trace's string augmentation String augmentation test failed, output: :886566/886566 renameat2(CWD, "/tmp/file1_RcMa", CWD, "/tmp/file2_RcMa", NOREPLACE) = 0---- end(-1) ---- 108: perf trace BTF general tests : FAILED! Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com> Tested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250528191148.89118-5-howardchu95@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2025-03-05perf test: Skip perf trace tests when running as non-rootNamhyung Kim
perf trace requires root because it needs to use tracepoints and BPF. Skip those test when it's not run as root. Before: $ perf test trace 15: Parse sched tracepoints fields : Skip (permissions) 80: perf ftrace tests : Skip 105: perf trace enum augmentation tests : FAILED! 106: perf trace BTF general tests : FAILED! 107: perf trace exit race : FAILED! 118: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping : Skip 125: Check Arm CoreSight trace data recording and synthesized samples: Skip 127: Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples : Skip 132: Check open filename arg using perf trace + vfs_getname : FAILED! After: $ perf test trace 15: Parse sched tracepoints fields : Skip (permissions) 80: perf ftrace tests : Skip 105: perf trace enum augmentation tests : Skip 106: perf trace BTF general tests : Skip 107: perf trace exit race : Skip 118: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping : Skip 125: Check Arm CoreSight trace data recording and synthesized samples: Skip 127: Check Arm SPE trace data recording and synthesized samples : Skip 132: Check open filename arg using perf trace + vfs_getname : Skip Tested-by: Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com> Cc: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250304022837.1877845-4-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
2025-01-08perf test trace_btf_general: Fix shellcheck warningJames Clark
Shellcheck versions < v0.7.2 can't follow this path so add the helper to fix the following warning: tests/shell/trace_btf_general.sh line 8: . "$(dirname $0)"/lib/probe.sh ^--------------------------^ SC1090: Can't follow non-constant source. Use a directive to specify location. Fixes: 0255338d69754a02 ("perf trace: Add tests for BTF general augmentation") Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250106164300.734202-1-james.clark@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2024-12-26perf trace: Add tests for BTF general augmentationHoward Chu
Currently, we only have 'perf trace' augmentation tests for enum arguments. This patch adds tests for more general syscall arguments, such as struct pointers, strings, and buffers. These tests utilize the 'perf config' system to configure 'the perf trace' output, as suggested by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>. Committer testing: root@number:~# perf test "BTF general" 109: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok root@number:~# perf test -v "BTF general" 109: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok root@number:~# perf test -vv "BTF general" 109: perf trace BTF general tests: --- start --- test child forked, pid 1410451 Checking if vmlinux BTF exists Testing perf trace's string augmentation Testing perf trace's buffer augmentation Testing perf trace's struct augmentation ---- end(0) ---- 109: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok root@number:~# It still fails sometimes, for instance when tested with: root@number:~# perf stat --null -r 10 perf test "BTF general" 109: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok 109: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok 109: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok 109: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok 109: perf trace BTF general tests : FAILED! 109: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok 109: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok 109: perf trace BTF general tests : FAILED! 109: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok 109: perf trace BTF general tests : Ok Performance counter stats for 'perf test BTF general' (10 runs): 2.148 +- 0.293 seconds time elapsed ( +- 13.63% ) root@number:~# But we can go on from here and fix things up with followup patches. Suggested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241215190712.787847-2-howardchu95@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>