kernel - Hosts the 0x221E linux distro kernel.

index : kernel

Hosts the 0x221E linux distro kernel.

Ubuntu

summary refs log tree commit diff

path: root/tools/perf/scripts/python/event_analyzing_sample.py

diff options

Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/event_analyzing_sample.py')

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions

erformance (for instance, massive but slow HDDs). For these folks, it's impossible to convince them to even entertain zswap if swapping also comes as a packaged deal. Writeback disabling is quite a useful feature in these situations - on a mixed workloads deployment, they can disable writeback for the more IO-sensitive workloads, and enable writeback for other background workloads. For instance, on a server with HDD, I allocate memories and populate them with random values (so that zswap store will always fail), and specify memory.high low enough to trigger reclaim. The time it takes to allocate the memories and just read through it a couple of times (doing silly things like computing the values' average etc.): zswap.writeback disabled: real 0m30.537s user 0m23.687s sys 0m6.637s 0 pages swapped in 0 pages swapped out zswap.writeback enabled: real 0m45.061s user 0m24.310s sys 0m8.892s 712686 pages swapped in 461093 pages swapped out (the last two lines are from vmstat -s). [nphamcs@gmail.com: add a comment about recurring zswap store failures leading to reclaim inefficiency] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231221005725.3446672-1-nphamcs@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231207192406.3809579-1-nphamcs@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz> Cc: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com> Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> zswap: shrink zswap pool based on memory pressure 2023-12-12T18:57:02Z Nhat Pham nphamcs@gmail.com 2023-11-30T19:40:23Z urn:sha1:b5ba474f3f518701249598b35c581b92a3c95b48 Currently, we only shrink the zswap pool when the user-defined limit is hit. This means that if we set the limit too high, cold data that are unlikely to be used again will reside in the pool, wasting precious memory. It is hard to predict how much zswap space will be needed ahead of time, as this depends on the workload (specifically, on factors such as memory access patterns and compressibility of the memory pages). This patch implements a memcg- and NUMA-aware shrinker for zswap, that is initiated when there is memory pressure. The shrinker does not have any parameter that must be tuned by the user, and can be opted in or out on a per-memcg basis. Furthermore, to make it more robust for many workloads and prevent overshrinking (i.e evicting warm pages that might be refaulted into memory), we build in the following heuristics: * Estimate the number of warm pages residing in zswap, and attempt to protect this region of the zswap LRU. * Scale the number of freeable objects by an estimate of the memory saving factor. The better zswap compresses the data, the fewer pages we will evict to swap (as we will otherwise incur IO for relatively small memory saving). * During reclaim, if the shrinker encounters a page that is also being brought into memory, the shrinker will cautiously terminate its shrinking action, as this is a sign that it is touching the warmer region of the zswap LRU. As a proof of concept, we ran the following synthetic benchmark: build the linux kernel in a memory-limited cgroup, and allocate some cold data in tmpfs to see if the shrinker could write them out and improved the overall performance. Depending on the amount of cold data generated, we observe from 14% to 35% reduction in kernel CPU time used in the kernel builds. [nphamcs@gmail.com: check shrinker enablement early, use less costly stat flushing] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231206194456.3234203-1-nphamcs@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-7-nphamcs@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> inux-6.6.y&id=bae9a78b17b87a7cef56cf492916007a58f65172'>net/mpls: Plumb support for filtering route dumpsDavid Ahern 2018-10-16net: Add struct for fib dump filterDavid Ahern 2018-10-10net/mpls: Implement handler for strict data checking on dumpsDavid Ahern 2018-10-08net: Update netconf dump handlers for strict data checkingDavid Ahern 2018-10-08rtnetlink: Update fib dumps for strict data checkingDavid Ahern 2018-10-08net: Add extack to nlmsg_parseDavid Ahern 2018-09-24mpls: allow routes on ip6gre devicesSaif Hasan


context:
space:
mode: