bcachefs: reflink_format.h - kernel - Hosts the 0x221E linux distro kernel.

Hosts the 0x221E linux distro kernel.

Ubuntu

diff options

author	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>	2024-01-21 02:54:47 -0500
committer	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>	2024-01-21 13:27:11 -0500
commit	8d52ba60c4dccbf5d45db70f41b82b18c38059bd (patch)
tree	ea97f296bd94f0ba783a81e91a6f1d80e2f6df39 /tools/perf/scripts/python
parent	b2fa1b633bac0c3b2d04ae00e8801414d251aace (diff)
download	kernel-8d52ba60c4dccbf5d45db70f41b82b18c38059bd.tar.gz

bcachefs: reflink_format.h

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python')

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions

eys in kernel memory, without limiting the number of keys that can be used. Such hardware also supports deriving a "software secret" for cryptographic tasks that can't be handled by inline encryption; this is needed for fscrypt to work properly. To support this hardware, allow struct blk_crypto_key to represent a hardware-wrapped key as an alternative to a raw key, and make drivers set flags in struct blk_crypto_profile to indicate which types of keys they support. Also add the ->derive_sw_secret() low-level operation, which drivers supporting wrapped keys must implement. For more information, see the detailed documentation which this patch adds to Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Tested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> # sm8650 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250204060041.409950-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> 2023-07-05blk-crypto: use dynamic lock class for blk_crypto_profile::lockEric Biggers When a device-mapper device is passing through the inline encryption support of an underlying device, calls to blk_crypto_evict_key() take the blk_crypto_profile::lock of the device-mapper device, then take the blk_crypto_profile::lock of the underlying device (nested). This isn't a real deadlock, but it causes a lockdep report because there is only one lock class for all instances of this lock. Lockdep subclasses don't really work here because the hierarchy of block devices is dynamic and could have more than 2 levels. Instead, register a dynamic lock class for each blk_crypto_profile, and associate that with the lock. This avoids false-positive lockdep reports like the following: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.4.0-rc5 #2 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- fscryptctl/1421 is trying to acquire lock: ffffff80829ca418 (&profile->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __blk_crypto_evict_key+0x44/0x1c0 but task is already holding lock: ffffff8086b68ca8 (&profile->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __blk_crypto_evict_key+0xc8/0x1c0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&profile->lock); lock(&profile->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation Fixes: 1b2628397058 ("block: Keyslot Manager for Inline Encryption") Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230610061139.212085-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> 2023-03-16blk-crypto: drop the NULL check from blk_crypto_put_keyslot()Eric Biggers Now that all callers of blk_crypto_put_keyslot() check for NULL before calling it, there is no need for blk_crypto_put_keyslot() to do the NULL check itself. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230315183907.53675-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> 2023-03-16blk-crypto: make blk_crypto_evict_key() more robustEric Biggers If blk_crypto_evict_key() sees that the key is still in-use (due to a bug) or that ->keyslot_evict failed, it currently just returns while leaving the key linked into the keyslot management structures. However, blk_crypto_evict_key() is only called in contexts such as inode eviction where failure is not an option. So actually the caller proceeds with freeing the blk_crypto_key regardless of the return value of blk_crypto_evict_key(). These two assumptions don't match, and the result is that there can be a use-after-free in blk_crypto_reprogram_all_keys() after one of these errors occurs. (Note, these errors *shouldn't* happen; we're just talking about what happens if they do anyway.) Fix this by making blk_crypto_evict_key() unlink the key from the keyslot management structures even on failure. Also improve some comments. Fixes: 1b2628397058 ("block: Keyslot Manager for Inline Encryption") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230315183907.53675-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> 2022-11-23blk-crypto: Add a missing include directiveBart Van Assche Allow the compiler to verify consistency of function declarations and function definitions. This patch fixes the following sparse errors: block/blk-crypto-profile.c:241:14: error: no previous prototype for ‘blk_crypto_get_keyslot’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes] 241 | blk_status_t blk_crypto_get_keyslot(struct blk_crypto_profile *profile, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ block/blk-crypto-profile.c:318:6: error: no previous prototype for ‘blk_crypto_put_keyslot’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes] 318 | void blk_crypto_put_keyslot(struct blk_crypto_keyslot *slot) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ block/blk-crypto-profile.c:344:6: error: no previous prototype for ‘__blk_crypto_cfg_supported’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes] 344 | bool __blk_crypto_cfg_supported(struct blk_crypto_profile *profile, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ block/blk-crypto-profile.c:373:5: error: no previous prototype for ‘__blk_crypto_evict_key’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes] 373 | int __blk_crypto_evict_key(struct blk_crypto_profile *profile, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221123172923.434339-1-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>


context:
space:
mode: