summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf/scripts/python/parallel-perf.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohn Madieu <john.madieu.xa@bp.renesas.com>2025-11-06 09:07:58 +0100
committerGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>2025-11-13 21:21:02 +0100
commit3b0cf6ab35909d7ac8d561e18159c62d42d914c2 (patch)
tree09b0fb33728dda73f77f810e4d5fd427a7cb9b43 /tools/perf/scripts/python/parallel-perf.py
parent8903597df7b6d511f81abb47708a33e9a1e6a530 (diff)
downloadkernel-3b0cf6ab35909d7ac8d561e18159c62d42d914c2.tar.gz
pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Refactor OEN register PWPR handling
Extract the OEN register write with PWPR protection logic into a helper function to eliminate code duplication between rzg2l_write_oen() and rzg2l_pinctrl_resume_noirq(). Introduce rzg2l_oen_write_with_pwpr() helper that encapsulates the PWPR unlock, OEN register write, and PWPR lock sequence. This helper must be called with pctrl->lock already held by the caller. Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/cip-dev/OS9PR01MB16368C765305362F5F4132759FFC4A@OS9PR01MB16368.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: John Madieu <john.madieu.xa@bp.renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106080758.36645-1-john.madieu.xa@bp.renesas.com Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/parallel-perf.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.46.0) at 2026-07-27 01:39:27 +0000
Linux-kernel memory model presentations at 2016 LinuxCon EU, 2016 Kernel Summit, 2016 Linux Plumbers Conference, 2017 linux.conf.au, or 2017 Linux Plumbers Conference microconference. However, one aspect of the history does bear repeating due to weak copyright tracking earlier in this project, which extends back to early 2015. This weakness came to light in late 2017 after an LKMM presentation by Paul in which an audience member noted the similarity of some LKMM code to code in early published papers. This prompted a copyright review. From Alan Stern: To say that the model was mine is not entirely accurate. Pieces of it (especially the Scpv and Atomic axioms) were taken directly from Jade's models. And of course the Happens-before and Propagation relations and axioms were heavily based on Jade and Luc's work, even though they weren't identical to the earlier versions. Only the RCU portion was completely original. . . . One can make a much better case that I wrote the bulk of lock.cat. However, it was inspired by Luc's earlier version (and still shares some elements in common), and of course it benefited from feedback and testing from all members of our group. The model prior to Alan's was Luc Maranget's. From Luc: I totally agree on Alan Stern's account of the linux kernel model genesis. I thank him for his acknowledgments of my participation to previous model drafts. I'd like to complete Alan Stern's statement: any bell cat code I have written has its roots in discussions with Jade Alglave and Paul McKenney. Moreover I have borrowed cat and bell code written by Jade Alglave freely. This copyright review therefore resulted in late adds to the copyright statements of several files. Discussion of v1 has raised several issues, which we do not believe should block acceptance given that this level of change will be ongoing, just as it has been with memory-barriers.txt: o Under what conditions should ordering provided by pure locking be seen by CPUs not holding the relevant lock(s)? In particular, should the message-passing pattern be forbidden? o Should examples involving C11 release sequences be forbidden? Note that this C11 is still a moving target for this issue: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p0735r0.html o Some details of the handling of internal dependencies for atomic read-modify-write atomic operations are still subject to debate. o Changes recently accepted into mainline greatly reduce the need to handle DEC Alpha as a special case. These changes add an smp_read_barrier_depends() to READ_ONCE(), thus causing Alpha to respect ordering of dependent reads. If these changes stick, the memory model can be simplified accordingly. o Will changes be required to accommodate RISC-V? Differences from v1: (http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113184031.GA26302@linux.vnet.ibm.com) o Add SPDX notations to .bell and .cat files, replacing textual license statements. o Add reference to upcoming ASPLOS paper to .bell and .cat files. o Updated identifier names in .bell and .cat files to match those used in the ASPLOS paper. o Updates to READMEs and other documentation based on review feedback. o Added a memory-ordering cheatsheet. o Update sigs to new Co-Developed-by and add acks and reviewed-bys. o Simplify rules detecting nested RCU read-side critical sections. o Update copyright statements as noted above. Co-Developed-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Co-Developed-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Co-Developed-by: Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk> Co-Developed-by: Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr> Co-Developed-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk> Signed-off-by: Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr> Signed-off-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>