summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf/scripts/python/net_dropmonitor.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>2014-07-24 12:11:47 +1000
committerDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>2014-07-24 12:11:47 +1000
commit549fa00679dd14beaaa685486549c637e8e02182 (patch)
treeed62bcf174d4ada1cc71d3e233f1f2f627f45c45 /tools/perf/scripts/python/net_dropmonitor.py
parentd716f8eedb143387afd35d337327090b8348159e (diff)
downloadkernel-549fa00679dd14beaaa685486549c637e8e02182.tar.gz
xfs: consolidate xfs_inumbers
From: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com> Consolidate xfs_inumbers() to make the formatter function return correct error and make the source code looks a bit neat. Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/net_dropmonitor.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.46.0) at 2026-08-17 01:23:58 +0000
ed with scenario where the workload is run in a three level of cgroup hierarchy with top level having min and low setup appropriately. $ netserver -6 # 36 instances of netperf with following params $ netperf -6 -H ::1 -l 60 -t TCP_SENDFILE -- -m 10K Results (average throughput of netperf): 1. root memcg 21694.8 Mbps 2. 6.0-rc1 10482.7 Mbps (-51.6%) 3. 6.0-rc1 + (A) 14542.5 Mbps (-32.9%) 4. 6.0-rc1 + (B) 12413.7 Mbps (-42.7%) 5. 6.0-rc1 + (C) 17063.7 Mbps (-21.3%) 6. 6.0-rc1 + (A+B+C) 20120.3 Mbps (-7.2%) With all three optimizations, the memcg overhead of this workload has been reduced from 51.6% to just 7.2%. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220619150456.GB34471@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/ This patch (of 3): For cgroups using low or min protections, the function propagate_protected_usage() was doing an atomic xchg() operation irrespectively. We can optimize out this atomic operation for one specific scenario where the workload is using the protection (i.e. min > 0) and the usage is above the protection (i.e. usage > min). This scenario is actually very common where the users want a part of their workload to be protected against the external reclaim. Though this optimization does introduce a race when the usage is around the protection and concurrent charges and uncharged trip it over or under the protection. In such cases, we might see lower effective protection but the subsequent charge/uncharge will correct it. To evaluate the impact of this optimization, on a 72 CPUs machine, we ran the following workload in a three level of cgroup hierarchy with top level having min and low setup appropriately to see if this optimization is effective for the mentioned case. $ netserver -6 # 36 instances of netperf with following params $ netperf -6 -H ::1 -l 60 -t TCP_SENDFILE -- -m 10K Results (average throughput of netperf): Without (6.0-rc1) 10482.7 Mbps With patch 14542.5 Mbps (38.7% improvement) With the patch, the throughput improved by 38.7% Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220825000506.239406-1-shakeelb@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220825000506.239406-2-shakeelb@google.com Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Reviewed-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com> Cc: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> mm: skip retry when new limit is not below old one in page_counter_set_max 2022-09-12T03:26:00Z Bui Quang Minh minhquangbui99@gmail.com 2022-08-21T15:40:55Z urn:sha1:32d772708009eb90f8eeed6ec8f76e06f07e41e9 In page_counter_set_max, we want to make sure the new limit is not below the concurrently-changing counter value. We read the counter and check that the limit is not below the counter before the swap. After the swap, we read the counter again and retry in case the counter is incremented as this may violate the requirement. Even though the page_counter_try_charge can see the old limit, it is guaranteed that the counter is not above the old limit after the increment. So in case the new limit is not below the old limit, the counter is guaranteed to be not above the new limit too. We can skip the retry in this case to optimize a little bit. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220821154055.109635-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> mm/page_counter: remove an incorrect call to propagate_protected_usage() 2022-01-15T14:30:27Z Donghai Qiao dqiao@redhat.com 2022-01-14T22:05:32Z urn:sha1:46a53371f3fd9bf873fdd9c4df75b1cd86df1098 propagate_protected_usage() is called to propagate the usage change in the page_counter structure. But there is a call to this function from page_counter_try_charge() when there is actually no usage change. Hence this call should be removed. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211118181125.3918222-1-dqiao@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Donghai Qiao <dqiao@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>