slab: add sheaf support for batching kfree_rcu() operations

Extend the sheaf infrastructure for more efficient kfree_rcu() handling.
For caches with sheaves, on each cpu maintain a rcu_free sheaf in
addition to main and spare sheaves.

kfree_rcu() operations will try to put objects on this sheaf. Once full,
the sheaf is detached and submitted to call_rcu() with a handler that
will try to put it in the barn, or flush to slab pages using bulk free,
when the barn is full. Then a new empty sheaf must be obtained to put
more objects there.

It's possible that no free sheaves are available to use for a new
rcu_free sheaf, and the allocation in kfree_rcu() context can only use
GFP_NOWAIT and thus may fail. In that case, fall back to the existing
kfree_rcu() implementation.

Expected advantages:
- batching the kfree_rcu() operations, that could eventually replace the
  existing batching
- sheaves can be reused for allocations via barn instead of being
  flushed to slabs, which is more efficient
  - this includes cases where only some cpus are allowed to process rcu
    callbacks (CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU)

Possible disadvantage:
- objects might be waiting for more than their grace period (it is
  determined by the last object freed into the sheaf), increasing memory
  usage - but the existing batching does that too.

Only implement this for CONFIG_KVFREE_RCU_BATCHED as the tiny
implementation favors smaller memory footprint over performance.

Also for now skip the usage of rcu sheaf for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT as the
contexts where kfree_rcu() is called might not be compatible with taking
a barn spinlock or a GFP_NOWAIT allocation of a new sheaf taking a
spinlock - the current kfree_rcu() implementation avoids doing that.

Teach kvfree_rcu_barrier() to flush all rcu_free sheaves from all caches
that have them. This is not a cheap operation, but the barrier usage is
rare - currently kmem_cache_destroy() or on module unload.

Add CONFIG_SLUB_STATS counters free_rcu_sheaf and free_rcu_sheaf_fail to
count how many kfree_rcu() used the rcu_free sheaf successfully and how
many had to fall back to the existing implementation.

Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

1 files changed, 26 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index e2b197e47866..005a4319c06a 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -1608,6 +1608,27 @@ static void kfree_rcu_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		kvfree_rcu_list(head);
 }
 
+static bool kfree_rcu_sheaf(void *obj)
+{
+	struct kmem_cache *s;
+	struct folio *folio;
+	struct slab *slab;
+
+	if (is_vmalloc_addr(obj))
+		return false;
+
+	folio = virt_to_folio(obj);
+	if (unlikely(!folio_test_slab(folio)))
+		return false;
+
+	slab = folio_slab(folio);
+	s = slab->slab_cache;
+	if (s->cpu_sheaves)
+		return __kfree_rcu_sheaf(s, obj);
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static bool
 need_offload_krc(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp)
 {
@@ -1952,6 +1973,9 @@ void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr)
 	if (!head)
 		might_sleep();
 
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && kfree_rcu_sheaf(ptr))
+		return;
+
 	// Queue the object but don't yet schedule the batch.
 	if (debug_rcu_head_queue(ptr)) {
 		// Probable double kfree_rcu(), just leak.
@@ -2026,6 +2050,8 @@ void kvfree_rcu_barrier(void)
 	bool queued;
 	int i, cpu;
 
+	flush_all_rcu_sheaves();
+
 	/*
 	 * Firstly we detach objects and queue them over an RCU-batch
 	 * for all CPUs. Finally queued works are flushed for each CPU.