e>
https://universe.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel/atom?h=linux-5.1.y2019-01-22T13:46:18ZARM: dts: vexpress: use list instead of tuple for mmci interrupts2019-01-22T13:46:18ZSudeep Hollasudeep.holla@arm.com2019-01-22T12:00:59Zurn:sha1:01980aa7b0d7fde864899787510ddc01c1657c9a
Vexpress motherboard MMCI requires dedicated interrupts for CMD and PIO,
which obviously should be expressed as a list. Current form uses tuple
and it works fine since interrupt-cells equal to 1.
Reported-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
ARM: dts: Modernize the Vexpress PL111 integration2018-11-29T07:31:41ZLinus Walleijlinus.walleij@linaro.org2018-02-15T15:12:29Zurn:sha1:f1fe12c8bf33241e04c57a0fc5b25b16ba77ba2d
The Versatile Express was submitted with the actual display
bridges unconnected (but defined in the device tree) and
mock "panels" encoded in the device tree node of the PL111
controller.
This doesn't even remotely describe the actual Versatile
Express hardware. Exploit the SiI9022 bridge by connecting
the PL111 pads to it, making it use EDID or fallback values
to drive the monitor.
The also has to use the reserved memory through the
CMA pool rather than by open coding a memory region and
remapping it explicitly in the driver. To achieve this,
a reserved-memory node must exist in the root of the
device tree, so we need to pull that out of the
motherboard .dtsi include files, and push it into each
top-level device tree instead.
We do the same manouver for all the Versatile Express
boards, taking into account the different location of the
video RAM depending on which chip select is used on
each platform.
This plays nicely with the new PL111 DRM driver and
follows the standard ways of assigning bridges and
memory pools for graphics.
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Mali DP Maintainers <malidp@foss.arm.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Tested-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
ARM: dts: vexpress: use standard gpio bindings for sys_{led,mci,flash}2018-05-11T13:12:20ZSudeep Hollasudeep.holla@arm.com2018-05-09T16:46:01Zurn:sha1:83be0e605e2cb1cc680b18ea426ea21beba720be
Commit 2cff6dba57b7 ("ARM: dts: vexpress: fix node name unit-address presence warnings")
removed the unit address as there was no associated reg property in
these sysreg nodes.
Also the latest DTC throws warnings for character '_' in the node names.
Warning (node_name_chars_strict): /sysreg@10000/sys_led: Character '_' not recommended in node name
Warning (node_name_chars_strict): /sysreg@10000/sys_mci: Character '_' not recommended in node name
Warning (node_name_chars_strict): /sysreg@10000/sys_flash: Character '_' not recommended in node name
The correct way to fix this as well as the original unit-address presence
warnings is to use the standard gpio controller binding and specify the
reg properties as per the hardware as it was before.
However note that Vexpress sysreg MFD driver will still continue to use
the hardcoded values for compatibility reasons.
Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
ARM: dts: vexpress: Restructure motherboard includes2018-05-09T16:46:38ZLinus Walleijlinus.walleij@linaro.org2018-04-27T18:54:04Zurn:sha1:bd7aff03406dbce495634e8b5d27e9b63f951720
It is a bit unorthodox to just include a file in the middle of a another
DTS file, it breaks the pattern from other device trees and also makes
it really hard to reference things across the files with phandles.
Restructure the include for the Versatile Express motherboards to happen
at the top of the file, reference the target nodes directly, and indent
the motherboard .dtsi files to reflect their actual depth in the
hierarchy.
This is a purely syntactic change that result in the same DTB files from
the DTS/DTSI files.
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Mali DP Maintainers <malidp@foss.arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license2017-11-02T10:10:55ZGreg Kroah-Hartmangregkh@linuxfoundation.org2017-11-01T14:07:57Zurn:sha1:b24413180f5600bcb3bb70fbed5cf186b60864bd
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>