distro kernel.</subtitle>
<id>https://universe.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel/atom?h=master</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://universe.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel/atom?h=master'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://universe.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel/'/>
<updated>2024-05-28T21:07:35Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>arm64: dts: qcom: Split PMU nodes for heterogeneous CPUs</title>
<updated>2024-05-28T21:07:35Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Rob Herring (Arm)</name>
<email>robh@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2024-04-17T20:42:46Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://universe.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel/commit/?id=c8a346e408cb2e516472658ff191f13626d8571e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:c8a346e408cb2e516472658ff191f13626d8571e</id>
<content type='text'>
Arm heterogeneous configurations should have separate PMU nodes for each
CPU uarch as the uarch specific events can be different. The
"arm,armv8-pmuv3" compatible is also intended for s/w models rather than
specific uarch implementations.

All the kryo CPUs are missing PMU compatibles, so they can't be fixed.

Signed-off-by: "Rob Herring (Arm)" &lt;robh@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417204247.3216703-1-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson &lt;andersson@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>