diff options
| author | Quanmin Yan <yanquanmin1@huawei.com> | 2025-10-20 21:01:24 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2025-11-16 17:28:09 -0800 |
| commit | e859a224fad65cb4848fe202aea9896a14fdb7f4 (patch) | |
| tree | e20975e68815ed8d8364483fc60e9df63d4ca8af /mm/damon/reclaim.c | |
| parent | 074f027d15c10cb376b3ad88405b8e512fa5b3a8 (diff) | |
mm/damon: add a min_sz_region parameter to damon_set_region_biggest_system_ram_default()
Patch series "mm/damon: fixes for address alignment issues in
DAMON_LRU_SORT and DAMON_RECLAIM", v2.
In DAMON_LRU_SORT and DAMON_RECLAIM, damon_set_regions() will apply
DAMON_MIN_REGION as the core address alignment, and the monitoring target
address ranges would be aligned on DAMON_MIN_REGION * addr_unit. When
users 1) set addr_unit to a value larger than 1, and 2) set the monitoring
target address range as not aligned on DAMON_MIN_REGION * addr_unit, it
will cause DAMON_LRU_SORT and DAMON_RECLAIM to operate on unexpectedly
large physical address ranges.
For example, if the user sets the monitoring target address range to [4,
8) and addr_unit as 1024, the aimed monitoring target address range is [4
KiB, 8 KiB). Assuming DAMON_MIN_REGION is 4096, so resulting target
address range will be [0, 4096) in the DAMON core layer address system,
and [0, 4 MiB) in the physical address space, which is an unexpected
range.
To fix the issue, add a min_sz_region parameter to
damon_set_region_biggest_system_ram_default() and use it when calling
damon_set_regions(), replacing the direct use of DAMON_MIN_REGION.
This patch (of 2):
In DAMON_LRU_SORT, damon_set_regions() will apply DAMON_MIN_REGION as the
core address alignment, and the monitoring target address ranges would be
aligned on DAMON_MIN_REGION * addr_unit. When users 1) set addr_unit to a
value larger than 1, and 2) set the monitoring target address range as not
aligned on DAMON_MIN_REGION * addr_unit, it will cause DAMON_LRU_SORT to
operate on unexpectedly large physical address ranges.
For example, if the user sets the monitoring target address range to [4,
8) and addr_unit as 1024, the aimed monitoring target address range is [4
KiB, 8 KiB). Assuming DAMON_MIN_REGION is 4096, so resulting target
address range will be [0, 4096) in the DAMON core layer address system,
and [0, 4 MiB) in the physical address space, which is an unexpected
range.
To fix the issue, add a min_sz_region parameter to
damon_set_region_biggest_system_ram_default() and use it when calling
damon_set_regions(), replacing the direct use of DAMON_MIN_REGION.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251020130125.2875164-1-yanquanmin1@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251020130125.2875164-2-yanquanmin1@huawei.com
Fixes: 2e0fe9245d6b ("mm/damon/lru_sort: support addr_unit for DAMON_LRU_SORT")
Signed-off-by: Quanmin Yan <yanquanmin1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: ze zuo <zuoze1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/damon/reclaim.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/damon/reclaim.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c index 7ba3d0f9a19a..e30811cafe90 100644 --- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c +++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c @@ -250,7 +250,8 @@ static int damon_reclaim_apply_parameters(void) err = damon_set_region_biggest_system_ram_default(param_target, &monitor_region_start, - &monitor_region_end); + &monitor_region_end, + DAMON_MIN_REGION); if (err) goto out; err = damon_commit_ctx(ctx, param_ctx); |
