summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>2020-08-06 23:26:11 -0700
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2020-08-21 13:07:27 +0200
commit53d366ea63309995c2840af6f0bdbbbb3c50ab1d (patch)
tree0c495c369dbad55d5b33f36068254191fef21301
parent8dd14f2f2b9108dd1f1df10ddf4c65527a047f63 (diff)
mm/hugetlb: fix calculation of adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible
commit 75802ca66354a39ab8e35822747cd08b3384a99a upstream. This is found by code observation only. Firstly, the worst case scenario should assume the whole range was covered by pmd sharing. The old algorithm might not work as expected for ranges like (1g-2m, 1g+2m), where the adjusted range should be (0, 1g+2m) but the expected range should be (0, 2g). Since at it, remove the loop since it should not be required. With that, the new code should be faster too when the invalidating range is huge. Mike said: : With range (1g-2m, 1g+2m) within a vma (0, 2g) the existing code will only : adjust to (0, 1g+2m) which is incorrect. : : We should cc stable. The original reason for adjusting the range was to : prevent data corruption (getting wrong page). Since the range is not : always adjusted correctly, the potential for corruption still exists. : : However, I am fairly confident that adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible : is only gong to be called in two cases: : : 1) for a single page : 2) for range == entire vma : : In those cases, the current code should produce the correct results. : : To be safe, let's just cc stable. Fixes: 017b1660df89 ("mm: migration: fix migration of huge PMD shared pages") Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200730201636.74778-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r--mm/hugetlb.c24
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 461324757c75..7a09ed981e7f 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -5201,25 +5201,21 @@ static bool vma_shareable(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
void adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long *start, unsigned long *end)
{
- unsigned long check_addr;
+ unsigned long a_start, a_end;
if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE))
return;
- for (check_addr = *start; check_addr < *end; check_addr += PUD_SIZE) {
- unsigned long a_start = check_addr & PUD_MASK;
- unsigned long a_end = a_start + PUD_SIZE;
+ /* Extend the range to be PUD aligned for a worst case scenario */
+ a_start = ALIGN_DOWN(*start, PUD_SIZE);
+ a_end = ALIGN(*end, PUD_SIZE);
- /*
- * If sharing is possible, adjust start/end if necessary.
- */
- if (range_in_vma(vma, a_start, a_end)) {
- if (a_start < *start)
- *start = a_start;
- if (a_end > *end)
- *end = a_end;
- }
- }
+ /*
+ * Intersect the range with the vma range, since pmd sharing won't be
+ * across vma after all
+ */
+ *start = max(vma->vm_start, a_start);
+ *end = min(vma->vm_end, a_end);
}
/*