kernel/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c, branch linux-6.2.y

selftests/bpf: Use ASSERT macros in lsm test

2021-04-26T04:09:02Z

Replacing CHECK with ASSERT macros. Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210414195147.1624932-8-jolsa@kernel.org

selftests/bpf: Add re-attach test to lsm test

2021-04-26T04:09:02Z

Adding the test to re-attach (detach/attach again) lsm programs, plus check that already linked program can't be attached again. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210414195147.1624932-6-jolsa@kernel.org

selftests/bpf: Remove duplicate include in test_lsm

2021-01-08T21:39:40Z

'unistd.h' included in 'selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c' is duplicated. Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210105152047.6070-1-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

selftests/bpf: Add sleepable tests

2020-08-28T19:20:33Z

Modify few tests to sanity test sleepable bpf functionality. Running 'bench trig-fentry-sleep' vs 'bench trig-fentry' and 'perf report': sleepable with SRCU: 3.86% bench [k] __srcu_read_unlock 3.22% bench [k] __srcu_read_lock 0.92% bench [k] bpf_prog_740d4210cdcd99a3_bench_trigger_fentry_sleep 0.50% bench [k] bpf_trampoline_10297 0.26% bench [k] __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable 0.21% bench [k] __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable sleepable with RCU_TRACE: 0.79% bench [k] bpf_prog_740d4210cdcd99a3_bench_trigger_fentry_sleep 0.72% bench [k] bpf_trampoline_10381 0.31% bench [k] __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable 0.29% bench [k] __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable non-sleepable with RCU: 0.88% bench [k] bpf_prog_740d4210cdcd99a3_bench_trigger_fentry 0.84% bench [k] bpf_trampoline_10297 0.13% bench [k] __bpf_prog_enter 0.12% bench [k] __bpf_prog_exit Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: KP Singh Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200827220114.69225-6-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com

bpf, lsm: Fix the file_mprotect LSM test.

2020-04-03T02:42:52Z

The test was previously using an mprotect on the heap memory allocated using malloc and was expecting the allocation to be always using sbrk(2). This is, however, not always true and in certain conditions malloc may end up using anonymous mmaps for heap alloctions. This means that the following condition that is used in the "lsm/file_mprotect" program is not sufficent to detect all mprotect calls done on heap memory: is_heap = (vma->vm_start >= vma->vm_mm->start_brk && vma->vm_end <= vma->vm_mm->brk); The test is updated to use an mprotect on memory allocated on the stack. While this would result in the splitting of the vma, this happens only after the security_file_mprotect hook. So, the condition used in the BPF program holds true. Fixes: 03e54f100d57 ("bpf: lsm: Add selftests for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM") Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: KP Singh Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200402200751.26372-1-kpsingh@chromium.org

bpf: lsm: Add selftests for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM

2020-03-29T23:35:11Z

* Load/attach a BPF program that hooks to file_mprotect (int) and bprm_committed_creds (void). * Perform an action that triggers the hook. * Verify if the audit event was received using the shared global variables for the process executed. * Verify if the mprotect returns a -EPERM. Signed-off-by: KP Singh Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman Reviewed-by: Florent Revest Reviewed-by: Thomas Garnier Reviewed-by: James Morris Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200329004356.27286-8-kpsingh@chromium.org