kernel/include/trace/events/vmscan.h, branch linux-4.15.y

Merge tag 'trace-v4.15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace

2017-11-17T22:58:01Z

Pull tracing updates from - allow module init functions to be traced - clean up some unused or not used by config events (saves space) - clean up of trace histogram code - add support for preempt and interrupt enabled/disable events - other various clean ups * tag 'trace-v4.15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace: (30 commits) tracing, thermal: Hide cpu cooling trace events when not in use tracing, thermal: Hide devfreq trace events when not in use ftrace: Kill FTRACE_OPS_FL_PER_CPU perf/ftrace: Small cleanup perf/ftrace: Fix function trace events perf/ftrace: Revert ("perf/ftrace: Fix double traces of perf on ftrace:function") tracing, dma-buf: Remove unused trace event dma_fence_annotate_wait_on tracing, memcg, vmscan: Hide trace events when not in use tracing/xen: Hide events that are not used when X86_PAE is not defined tracing: mark trace_test_buffer as __maybe_unused printk: Remove superfluous memory barriers from printk_safe ftrace: Clear hashes of stale ips of init memory tracing: Add support for preempt and irq enable/disable events tracing: Prepare to add preempt and irq trace events ftrace/kallsyms: Have /proc/kallsyms show saved mod init functions ftrace: Add freeing algorithm to free ftrace_mod_maps ftrace: Save module init functions kallsyms symbols for tracing ftrace: Allow module init functions to be traced ftrace: Add a ftrace_free_mem() function for modules to use tracing: Reimplement log2 ...

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

2017-11-02T10:10:55Z

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

tracing, memcg, vmscan: Hide trace events when not in use

2017-10-13T15:08:03Z

When trace events are defined but not used they still create data structures and functions for their use, even though nothing may be using them. The trace events mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin, mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin, mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end, and mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end are not used if CONFIG_MEMCG is not defined. Do not create these trace events unless CONFIG_MEMCG is defined. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171012184632.2bd247cd@gandalf.local.home Acked-by: Michal Hocko Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware)

mm, vmscan: add mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low tracepoint

2017-02-23T00:41:29Z

Currently we have tracepoints for both active and inactive LRU lists reclaim but we do not have any which would tell us why we we decided to age the active list. Without that it is quite hard to diagnose active/inactive lists balancing. Add mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low tracepoint to tell us this information. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-8-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Hillf Danton Acked-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, vmscan: enhance mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive tracepoint

2017-02-23T00:41:29Z

mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive will currently report the number of scanned and reclaimed pages. This doesn't give us an idea how the reclaim went except for the overall effectiveness though. Export and show other counters which will tell us why we couldn't reclaim some pages. - nr_dirty, nr_writeback, nr_congested and nr_immediate tells us how many pages are blocked due to IO - nr_activate tells us how many pages were moved to the active list - nr_ref_keep reports how many pages are kept on the LRU due to references (mostly for the file pages which are about to go for another round through the inactive list) - nr_unmap_fail - how many pages failed to unmap All these are rather low level so they might change in future but the tracepoint is already implementation specific so no tools should be depending on its stability. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-7-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Hillf Danton Acked-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, vmscan: show LRU name in mm_vmscan_lru_isolate tracepoint

2017-02-23T00:41:29Z

mm_vmscan_lru_isolate currently prints only whether the LRU we isolate from is file or anonymous but we do not know which LRU this is. It is useful to know whether the list is active or inactive, since we are using the same function to isolate pages from both of them and it's hard to distinguish otherwise. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-5-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Hillf Danton Acked-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Minchan Kim Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, vmscan: show the number of skipped pages in mm_vmscan_lru_isolate

2017-02-23T00:41:29Z

mm_vmscan_lru_isolate shows the number of requested, scanned and taken pages. This is mostly OK but on 32b systems the number of scanned pages is quite misleading because it includes both the scanned and skipped pages. Moreover the skipped part is scaled based on the number of taken pages. Let's report the exact numbers without any additional logic and add the number of skipped pages. This should make the reported data much more easier to interpret. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-4-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Minchan Kim Acked-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, vmscan: add active list aging tracepoint

2017-02-23T00:41:29Z

Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to track active list aging. Introduce mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active which reports the number of - nr_taken is number of isolated pages from the active list - nr_referenced pages which tells us that we are hitting referenced pages which are deactivated. If this is a large part of the reported nr_deactivated pages then we might be hitting into the active list too early because they might be still part of the working set. This might help to debug performance issues. - nr_active pages which tells us how many pages are kept on the active list - mostly exec file backed pages. A high number can indicate that we might be trashing on executables. [mhocko@suse.com: update] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104135244.GJ25453@dhcp22.suse.cz Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-3-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Hillf Danton Acked-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Minchan Kim Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, vmscan: remove unused mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate

2017-02-23T00:41:29Z

Patch series "vm, vmscan: enahance vmscan tracepoints", v2. While debugging [2] I've realized that there is some room for improvements in the tracepoints set we offer currently. I had hard times to make any conclusion from the existing ones. The resulting problem turned out to be active list aging [3] and we are missing at least two tracepoints to debug such a problem. Some existing tracepoints could export more information to see _why_ the reclaim progress cannot be made not only _how much_ we could reclaim. The later could be seen quite reasonably from the vmstat counters already. It can be argued that we are showing too many implementation details in those tracepoints but I consider them way too lowlevel already to be usable by any kernel independent userspace. I would be _really_ surprised if anything but debugging tools have used them. Any feedback is highly appreciated. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161228153032.10821-1-mhocko@kernel.org [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161215225702.GA27944@boerne.fritz.box [3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161223105157.GB23109@dhcp22.suse.cz This patch (of 8): The trace point is not used since 925b7673cce3 ("mm: make per-memcg LRU lists exclusive") so it can be removed. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-2-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Hillf Danton Acked-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, vmscan: add classzone information to tracepoints

2016-07-28T23:07:41Z

This is convenient when tracking down why the skip count is high because it'll show what classzone kswapd woke up at and what zones are being isolated. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-29-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Hillf Danton Acked-by: Johannes Weiner Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: Rik van Riel Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds