kernel/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h, branch linux-2.6.36.y

Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs-2.6

2010-08-10T18:26:52Z

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs-2.6: (96 commits) no need for list_for_each_entry_safe()/resetting with superblock list Fix sget() race with failing mount vfs: don't hold s_umount over close_bdev_exclusive() call sysv: do not mark superblock dirty on remount sysv: do not mark superblock dirty on mount btrfs: remove junk sb_dirt change BFS: clean up the superblock usage AFFS: wait for sb synchronization when needed AFFS: clean up dirty flag usage cifs: truncate fallout mbcache: fix shrinker function return value mbcache: Remove unused features add f_flags to struct statfs(64) pass a struct path to vfs_statfs update VFS documentation for method changes. All filesystems that need invalidate_inode_buffers() are doing that explicitly convert remaining ->clear_inode() to ->evict_inode() Make ->drop_inode() just return whether inode needs to be dropped fs/inode.c:clear_inode() is gone fs/inode.c:evict() doesn't care about delete vs. non-delete paths now ... Fix up trivial conflicts in fs/nilfs2/super.c

convert reiserfs to ->evict_inode()

2010-08-09T20:48:23Z

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

reiserfs: typo comment fix

2010-07-19T09:02:51Z

Fix trivial typo in code comment (change adn for and), also change comment style for proper coding style. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina

pass writeback_control to ->write_inode

2010-03-05T18:25:52Z

This gives the filesystem more information about the writeback that is happening. Trond requested this for the NFS unstable write handling, and other filesystems might benefit from this too by beeing able to distinguish between the different callers in more detail. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Al Viro

Merge branch 'reiserfs/kill-bkl' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/random-tracing

2010-01-02T19:17:05Z

* 'reiserfs/kill-bkl' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/random-tracing: reiserfs: Safely acquire i_mutex from xattr_rmdir reiserfs: Safely acquire i_mutex from reiserfs_for_each_xattr reiserfs: Fix journal mutex <-> inode mutex lock inversion reiserfs: Fix unwanted recursive reiserfs lock in reiserfs_unlink() reiserfs: Relax lock before open xattr dir in reiserfs_xattr_set_handle() reiserfs: Relax reiserfs lock while freeing the journal reiserfs: Fix reiserfs lock <-> i_mutex dependency inversion on xattr reiserfs: Warn on lock relax if taken recursively reiserfs: Fix reiserfs lock <-> i_xattr_sem dependency inversion reiserfs: Fix remaining in-reclaim-fs <-> reclaim-fs-on locking inversion reiserfs: Fix reiserfs lock <-> inode mutex dependency inversion reiserfs: Fix reiserfs lock and journal lock inversion dependency reiserfs: Fix possible recursive lock

reiserfs: Warn on lock relax if taken recursively

2010-01-02T00:54:37Z

When we relax the reiserfs lock to avoid creating unwanted dependencies against others locks while grabbing these, we want to ensure it has not been taken recursively, otherwise the lock won't be really relaxed. Only its depth will be decreased. The unwanted dependency would then actually happen. To prevent from that, add a reiserfs_lock_check_recursive() call in the places that need it. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Alexander Beregalov Cc: Chris Mason Cc: Ingo Molnar

reiserfs: Fix reiserfs lock <-> i_xattr_sem dependency inversion

2010-01-02T00:54:04Z

i_xattr_sem depends on the reiserfs lock. But after we grab i_xattr_sem, we may relax/relock the reiserfs lock while waiting on a freezed filesystem, creating a dependency inversion between the two locks. In order to avoid the i_xattr_sem -> reiserfs lock dependency, let's create a reiserfs_down_read_safe() that acts like reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe(): relax the reiserfs lock while grabbing another lock to avoid undesired dependencies induced by the heivyweight reiserfs lock. This fixes the following warning: [ 990.005931] ======================================================= [ 990.012373] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 990.013233] 2.6.33-rc1 #1 [ 990.013233] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 990.013233] dbench/1891 is trying to acquire lock: [ 990.013233] (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [] reiserfs_write_lock+0x35/0x50 [ 990.013233] [ 990.013233] but task is already holding lock: [ 990.013233] (&REISERFS_I(inode)->i_xattr_sem){+.+.+.}, at: [] reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0x8a/0x470 [ 990.013233] [ 990.013233] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 990.013233] [ 990.013233] [ 990.013233] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 990.013233] [ 990.013233] -> #1 (&REISERFS_I(inode)->i_xattr_sem){+.+.+.}: [ 990.013233] [] __lock_acquire+0xf9c/0x1560 [ 990.013233] [] lock_acquire+0x8f/0xb0 [ 990.013233] [] down_write+0x44/0x80 [ 990.013233] [] reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0x8a/0x470 [ 990.013233] [] reiserfs_xattr_set+0xb0/0x150 [ 990.013233] [] user_set+0x8a/0x90 [ 990.013233] [] reiserfs_setxattr+0xaa/0xb0 [ 990.013233] [] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x36/0xa0 [ 990.013233] [] vfs_setxattr+0xbc/0xc0 [ 990.013233] [] setxattr+0xc0/0x150 [ 990.013233] [] sys_fsetxattr+0x8d/0xa0 [ 990.013233] [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 990.013233] [ 990.013233] -> #0 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}: [ 990.013233] [] __lock_acquire+0x12d0/0x1560 [ 990.013233] [] lock_acquire+0x8f/0xb0 [ 990.013233] [] __mutex_lock_common+0x47/0x3b0 [ 990.013233] [] mutex_lock_nested+0x3e/0x50 [ 990.013233] [] reiserfs_write_lock+0x35/0x50 [ 990.013233] [] reiserfs_prepare_write+0x45/0x180 [ 990.013233] [] reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0x2a6/0x470 [ 990.013233] [] reiserfs_xattr_set+0xb0/0x150 [ 990.013233] [] user_set+0x8a/0x90 [ 990.013233] [] reiserfs_setxattr+0xaa/0xb0 [ 990.013233] [] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x36/0xa0 [ 990.013233] [] vfs_setxattr+0xbc/0xc0 [ 990.013233] [] setxattr+0xc0/0x150 [ 990.013233] [] sys_fsetxattr+0x8d/0xa0 [ 990.013233] [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 990.013233] [ 990.013233] other info that might help us debug this: [ 990.013233] [ 990.013233] 2 locks held by dbench/1891: [ 990.013233] #0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){+.+.+.}, at: [] vfs_setxattr+0x78/0xc0 [ 990.013233] #1: (&REISERFS_I(inode)->i_xattr_sem){+.+.+.}, at: [] reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0x8a/0x470 [ 990.013233] [ 990.013233] stack backtrace: [ 990.013233] Pid: 1891, comm: dbench Not tainted 2.6.33-rc1 #1 [ 990.013233] Call Trace: [ 990.013233] [] print_circular_bug+0xe9/0xf0 [ 990.013233] [] __lock_acquire+0x12d0/0x1560 [ 990.013233] [] ? reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0x8a/0x470 [ 990.013233] [] lock_acquire+0x8f/0xb0 [ 990.013233] [] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x35/0x50 [ 990.013233] [] ? reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0x8a/0x470 [ 990.013233] [] __mutex_lock_common+0x47/0x3b0 [ 990.013233] [] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x35/0x50 [ 990.013233] [] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x35/0x50 [ 990.013233] [] ? mark_held_locks+0x72/0xa0 [ 990.013233] [] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xbd/0x140 [ 990.013233] [] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14d/0x1a0 [ 990.013233] [] mutex_lock_nested+0x3e/0x50 [ 990.013233] [] reiserfs_write_lock+0x35/0x50 [ 990.013233] [] reiserfs_prepare_write+0x45/0x180 [ 990.013233] [] reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0x2a6/0x470 [ 990.013233] [] reiserfs_xattr_set+0xb0/0x150 [ 990.013233] [] ? __mutex_lock_common+0x284/0x3b0 [ 990.013233] [] user_set+0x8a/0x90 [ 990.013233] [] reiserfs_setxattr+0xaa/0xb0 [ 990.013233] [] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x36/0xa0 [ 990.013233] [] vfs_setxattr+0xbc/0xc0 [ 990.013233] [] setxattr+0xc0/0x150 [ 990.013233] [] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xb8/0x100 [ 990.013233] [] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10 [ 990.013233] [] ? cpu_clock+0x43/0x50 [ 990.013233] [] ? fget+0xb0/0x110 [ 990.013233] [] ? fget+0x0/0x110 [ 990.013233] [] ? sysret_check+0x27/0x62 [ 990.013233] [] sys_fsetxattr+0x8d/0xa0 [ 990.013233] [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Reported-and-tested-by: Christian Kujau Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Alexander Beregalov Cc: Chris Mason Cc: Ingo Molnar

reiserfs: Fix reiserfs lock <-> inode mutex dependency inversion

2009-12-16T22:25:50Z

The reiserfs lock -> inode mutex dependency gets inverted when we relax the lock while walking to the tree. To fix this, use a specialized version of reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe that takes care of mutex subclasses. Then we can grab the inode mutex with I_MUTEX_XATTR subclass without any reiserfs lock dependency. This fixes the following report: [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 2.6.32-06793-gf405425-dirty #2 ------------------------------------------------------- mv/18566 is trying to acquire lock: (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [] reiserfs_write_lock+0x28= /0x40 but task is already holding lock: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5/3){+.+.+.}, at: [] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x10c/0x380 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5/3){+.+.+.}: [] validate_chain+0xa23/0xf70 [] __lock_acquire+0x4e5/0xa70 [] lock_acquire+0x7a/0xa0 [] mutex_lock_nested+0x5f/0x2b0 [] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x84/0x380 [] reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x15/0x50 [] reiserfs_delete_inode+0x8f/0x140 [] generic_delete_inode+0x9c/0x150 [] generic_drop_inode+0x3d/0x60 [] iput+0x47/0x50 [] do_unlinkat+0xdb/0x160 [] sys_unlink+0x10/0x20 [] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36 -> #0 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}: [] validate_chain+0xf68/0xf70 [] __lock_acquire+0x4e5/0xa70 [] lock_acquire+0x7a/0xa0 [] mutex_lock_nested+0x5f/0x2b0 [] reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [] search_by_key+0x1f7b/0x21b0 [] search_by_entry_key+0x1f/0x3b0 [] reiserfs_find_entry+0x77/0x400 [] reiserfs_lookup+0x85/0x130 [] __lookup_hash+0xb4/0x110 [] lookup_one_len+0xb3/0x100 [] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x120/0x380 [] reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x15/0x50 [] reiserfs_delete_inode+0x8f/0x140 [] generic_delete_inode+0x9c/0x150 [] generic_drop_inode+0x3d/0x60 [] iput+0x47/0x50 [] dentry_iput+0x6f/0xf0 [] d_kill+0x24/0x50 [] dput+0x5b/0x120 [] sys_renameat+0x1b9/0x230 [] sys_rename+0x28/0x30 [] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36 other info that might help us debug this: 2 locks held by mv/18566: #0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5/1){+.+.+.}, at: [] lock_rename+0xcc/0xd0 #1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5/3){+.+.+.}, at: [] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x10c/0x380 stack backtrace: Pid: 18566, comm: mv Tainted: G C 2.6.32-06793-gf405425-dirty #2 Call Trace: [] ? printk+0x18/0x1e [] print_circular_bug+0xc0/0xd0 [] validate_chain+0xf68/0xf70 [] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0x10 [] __lock_acquire+0x4e5/0xa70 [] lock_acquire+0x7a/0xa0 [] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [] mutex_lock_nested+0x5f/0x2b0 [] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [] ? schedule+0x27a/0x440 [] reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [] search_by_key+0x1f7b/0x21b0 [] ? __lock_acquire+0x506/0xa70 [] ? lock_release_non_nested+0x1e7/0x340 [] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x124/0x170 [] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10 [] ? T.316+0x15/0x1a0 [] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x9d/0x100 [] search_by_entry_key+0x1f/0x3b0 [] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x9a/0x120 [] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x124/0x170 [] reiserfs_find_entry+0x77/0x400 [] reiserfs_lookup+0x85/0x130 [] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x9d/0x100 [] __lookup_hash+0xb4/0x110 [] lookup_one_len+0xb3/0x100 [] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x120/0x380 [] ? delete_one_xattr+0x0/0x1c0 [] ? math_error+0x22/0x150 [] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [] reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x15/0x50 [] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [] reiserfs_delete_inode+0x8f/0x140 [] ? generic_delete_inode+0x5f/0x150 [] ? reiserfs_delete_inode+0x0/0x140 [] generic_delete_inode+0x9c/0x150 [] generic_drop_inode+0x3d/0x60 [] iput+0x47/0x50 [] dentry_iput+0x6f/0xf0 [] d_kill+0x24/0x50 [] dput+0x5b/0x120 [] sys_renameat+0x1b9/0x230 [] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x9d/0x100 [] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0x10 [] ? cpu_clock+0x4e/0x60 [] ? do_page_fault+0x155/0x370 [] ? up_read+0x16/0x30 [] ? do_page_fault+0x155/0x370 [] sys_rename+0x28/0x30 [] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36 Reported-by: Alexander Beregalov Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Chris Mason Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner

reiserfs: don't compile procfs.o at all if no support

2009-12-16T15:20:06Z

* small define cleanup in header * fix #ifdeffery in procfs.c via Kconfig Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Jeff Mahoney Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

reiserfs: remove /proc/fs/reiserfs/version

2009-12-16T15:20:06Z

/proc/fs/reiserfs/version is on the way of removing ->read_proc interface. It's empty however, so simply remove it instead of doing dummy conversion. It's hard to see what information userspace can extract from empty file. Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Jeff Mahoney Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds