kernel/fs/overlayfs, branch linux-5.1.y

ovl: make i_ino consistent with st_ino in more cases

2019-06-25T03:34:54Z

commit 6dde1e42f497b2d4e22466f23019016775607947 upstream. Relax the condition that overlayfs supports nfs export, to require that i_ino is consistent with st_ino/d_ino. It is enough to require that st_ino and d_ino are consistent. This fixes the failure of xfstest generic/504, due to mismatch of st_ino to inode number in the output of /proc/locks. Fixes: 12574a9f4c9c ("ovl: consistent i_ino for non-samefs with xino") Cc: # v4.19 Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ovl: fix bogus -Wmaybe-unitialized warning

2019-06-25T03:34:53Z

[ Upstream commit 1dac6f5b0ed2601be21bb4e27a44b0c3e667b7f4 ] gcc gets a bit confused by the logic in ovl_setup_trap() and can't figure out whether the local 'trap' variable in the caller was initialized or not: fs/overlayfs/super.c: In function 'ovl_fill_super': fs/overlayfs/super.c:1333:4: error: 'trap' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] iput(trap); ^~~~~~~~~~ fs/overlayfs/super.c:1312:17: note: 'trap' was declared here Reword slightly to make it easier for the compiler to understand. Fixes: 146d62e5a586 ("ovl: detect overlapping layers") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ovl: don't fail with disconnected lower NFS

2019-06-25T03:34:53Z

[ Upstream commit 9179c21dc6ed1c993caa5fe4da876a6765c26af7 ] NFS mounts can be disconnected from fs root. Don't fail the overlapping layer check because of this. The check is not authoritative anyway, since topology can change during or after the check. Reported-by: Antti Antinoja Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Fixes: 146d62e5a586 ("ovl: detect overlapping layers") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ovl: detect overlapping layers

2019-06-25T03:34:52Z

[ Upstream commit 146d62e5a5867fbf84490d82455718bfb10fe824 ] Overlapping overlay layers are not supported and can cause unexpected behavior, but overlayfs does not currently check or warn about these configurations. User is not supposed to specify the same directory for upper and lower dirs or for different lower layers and user is not supposed to specify directories that are descendants of each other for overlay layers, but that is exactly what this zysbot repro did: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=12c7a94f400000 Moving layer root directories into other layers while overlayfs is mounted could also result in unexpected behavior. This commit places "traps" in the overlay inode hash table. Those traps are dummy overlay inodes that are hashed by the layers root inodes. On mount, the hash table trap entries are used to verify that overlay layers are not overlapping. While at it, we also verify that overlay layers are not overlapping with directories "in-use" by other overlay instances as upperdir/workdir. On lookup, the trap entries are used to verify that overlay layers root inodes have not been moved into other layers after mount. Some examples: $ ./run --ov --samefs -s ... ( mkdir -p base/upper/0/u base/upper/0/w base/lower lower upper mnt mount -o bind base/lower lower mount -o bind base/upper upper mount -t overlay none mnt ... -o lowerdir=lower,upperdir=upper/0/u,workdir=upper/0/w) $ umount mnt $ mount -t overlay none mnt ... -o lowerdir=base,upperdir=upper/0/u,workdir=upper/0/w [ 94.434900] overlayfs: overlapping upperdir path mount: mount overlay on mnt failed: Too many levels of symbolic links $ mount -t overlay none mnt ... -o lowerdir=upper/0/u,upperdir=upper/0/u,workdir=upper/0/w [ 151.350132] overlayfs: conflicting lowerdir path mount: none is already mounted or mnt busy $ mount -t overlay none mnt ... -o lowerdir=lower:lower/a,upperdir=upper/0/u,workdir=upper/0/w [ 201.205045] overlayfs: overlapping lowerdir path mount: mount overlay on mnt failed: Too many levels of symbolic links $ mount -t overlay none mnt ... -o lowerdir=lower,upperdir=upper/0/u,workdir=upper/0/w $ mv base/upper/0/ base/lower/ $ find mnt/0 mnt/0 mnt/0/w find: 'mnt/0/w/work': Too many levels of symbolic links find: 'mnt/0/u': Too many levels of symbolic links Reported-by: syzbot+9c69c282adc4edd2b540@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ovl: support stacked SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA

2019-06-15T09:53:06Z

commit 9e46b840c7053b5f7a245e98cd239b60d189a96c upstream. Overlay file f_pos is the master copy that is preserved through copy up and modified on read/write, but only real fs knows how to SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA and real fs may impose limitations that are more strict than ->s_maxbytes for specific files, so we use the real file to perform seeks. We do not call real fs for SEEK_CUR:0 query and for SEEK_SET:0 requests. Fixes: d1d04ef8572b ("ovl: stack file ops") Reported-by: Eddie Horng Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ovl: check the capability before cred overridden

2019-06-15T09:53:06Z

commit 98487de318a6f33312471ae1e2afa16fbf8361fe upstream. We found that it return success when we set IMMUTABLE_FL flag to a file in docker even though the docker didn't have the capability CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE. The commit d1d04ef8572b ("ovl: stack file ops") and dab5ca8fd9dd ("ovl: add lsattr/chattr support") implemented chattr operations on a regular overlay file. ovl_real_ioctl() overridden the current process's subjective credentials with ofs->creator_cred which have the capability CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE so that it will return success in vfs_ioctl()->cap_capable(). Fix this by checking the capability before cred overridden. And here we only care about APPEND_FL and IMMUTABLE_FL, so get these information from inode. [SzM: move check and call to underlying fs inside inode locked region to prevent two such calls from racing with each other] Signed-off-by: Jiufei Xue Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Cc: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ovl: do not generate duplicate fsnotify events for "fake" path

2019-06-15T09:52:57Z

[ Upstream commit d989903058a83e8536cc7aadf9256a47d5c173fe ] Overlayfs "fake" path is used for stacked file operations on underlying files. Operations on files with "fake" path must not generate fsnotify events with path data, because those events have already been generated at overlayfs layer and because the reported event->fd for fanotify marks on underlying inode/filesystem will have the wrong path (the overlayfs path). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20190423065024.12695-1-jencce.kernel@gmail.com/ Reported-by: Murphy Zhou Fixes: d1d04ef8572b ("ovl: stack file ops") Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ovl: relax WARN_ON() for overlapping layers use case

2019-05-31T13:43:12Z

commit acf3062a7e1ccf67c6f7e7c28671a6708fde63b0 upstream. This nasty little syzbot repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=12c7a94f400000 Creates overlay mounts where the same directory is both in upper and lower layers. Simplified example: mkdir foo work mount -t overlay none foo -o"lowerdir=.,upperdir=foo,workdir=work" The repro runs several threads in parallel that attempt to chdir into foo and attempt to symlink/rename/exec/mkdir the file bar. The repro hits a WARN_ON() I placed in ovl_instantiate(), which suggests that an overlay inode already exists in cache and is hashed by the pointer of the real upper dentry that ovl_create_real() has just created. At the point of the WARN_ON(), for overlay dir inode lock is held and upper dir inode lock, so at first, I did not see how this was possible. On a closer look, I see that after ovl_create_real(), because of the overlapping upper and lower layers, a lookup by another thread can find the file foo/bar that was just created in upper layer, at overlay path foo/foo/bar and hash the an overlay inode with the new real dentry as lower dentry. This is possible because the overlay directory foo/foo is not locked and the upper dentry foo/bar is in dcache, so ovl_lookup() can find it without taking upper dir inode shared lock. Overlapping layers is considered a wrong setup which would result in unexpected behavior, but it shouldn't crash the kernel and it shouldn't trigger WARN_ON() either, so relax this WARN_ON() and leave a pr_warn() instead to cover all cases of failure to get an overlay inode. The error returned from failure to insert new inode to cache with inode_insert5() was changed to -EEXIST, to distinguish from the error -ENOMEM returned on failure to get/allocate inode with iget5_locked(). Reported-by: syzbot+9c69c282adc4edd2b540@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 01b39dcc9568 ("ovl: use inode_insert5() to hash a newly...") Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ovl: fix missing upper fs freeze protection on copy up for ioctl

2019-05-25T16:16:35Z

commit 3428030da004a1128cbdcf93dc03e16f184d845b upstream. Generalize the helper ovl_open_maybe_copy_up() and use it to copy up file with data before FS_IOC_SETFLAGS ioctl. The FS_IOC_SETFLAGS ioctl is a bit of an odd ball in vfs, which probably caused the confusion. File may be open O_RDONLY, but ioctl modifies the file. VFS does not call mnt_want_write_file() nor lock inode mutex, but fs-specific code for FS_IOC_SETFLAGS does. So ovl_ioctl() calls mnt_want_write_file() for the overlay file, and fs-specific code calls mnt_want_write_file() for upper fs file, but there was no call for ovl_want_write() for copy up duration which prevents overlayfs from copying up on a frozen upper fs. Fixes: dab5ca8fd9dd ("ovl: add lsattr/chattr support") Cc: # v4.19 Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Acked-by: Vivek Goyal Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ovl: Do not lose security.capability xattr over metadata file copy-up

2019-02-13T10:14:46Z

If a file has been copied up metadata only, and later data is copied up, upper loses any security.capability xattr it has (underlying filesystem clears it as upon file write). From a user's point of view, this is just a file copy-up and that should not result in losing security.capability xattr. Hence, before data copy up, save security.capability xattr (if any) and restore it on upper after data copy up is complete. Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein Fixes: 0c2888749363 ("ovl: A new xattr OVL_XATTR_METACOPY for file on upper") Cc: # v4.19+ Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi