kernel/fs/lockd/svclock.c, branch linux-5.1.y

fs/locks: merge posix_unblock_lock() and locks_delete_block()

2018-12-07T11:50:56Z

posix_unblock_lock() is not specific to posix locks, and behaves nearly identically to locks_delete_block() - the former returning a status while the later doesn't. So discard posix_unblock_lock() and use locks_delete_block() instead, after giving that function an appropriate return value. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton

nfsd: fix leaked file lock with nfs exported overlayfs

2018-08-09T20:11:21Z

nfsd and lockd call vfs_lock_file() to lock/unlock the inode returned by locks_inode(file). Many places in nfsd/lockd code use the inode returned by file_inode(file) for lock manipulation. With Overlayfs, file_inode() (the underlying inode) is not the same object as locks_inode() (the overlay inode). This can result in "Leaked POSIX lock" messages and eventually to a kernel crash as reported by Eddie Horng: https://marc.info/?l=linux-unionfs&m=153086643202072&w=2 Fix all the call sites in nfsd/lockd that should use locks_inode(). This is a correctness bug that manifested when overlayfs gained NFS export support in v4.16. Reported-by: Eddie Horng Tested-by: Eddie Horng Cc: Jeff Layton Fixes: 8383f1748829 ("ovl: wire up NFS export operations") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

2017-11-02T10:10:55Z

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

lockd: remove redundant check on block

2017-04-25T21:25:56Z

A null check followed by a return is being performed already, so block is always non-null at the second check on block, hence we can remove this redundant null-check (Detected by PVS-Studio). Also re-work comment to clean up a check-patch warning. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields

sunrpc/lockd: fix references to the BKL

2015-01-23T15:29:12Z

The BKL is completely out of the picture in the lockd and sunrpc code these days. Update the antiquated comments that refer to it. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields

lockd: eliminate LOCKD_DEBUG

2014-11-24T22:24:08Z

LOCKD_DEBUG is always the same value as CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG, so we can just use it instead. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust

lockd: rip out deferred lock handling from testlock codepath

2014-09-09T20:01:09Z

As Kinglong points out, the nlm_block->b_fl field is no longer used at all. Also, vfs_test_lock in the generic locking code will only return FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED if FL_SLEEP is set, and it isn't here. The only other place that returns that value is the DLM lock code, but it only does that in dlm_posix_lock, never in dlm_posix_get. Remove all of the deferred locking code from the testlock codepath since it doesn't appear to ever be used anyway. I do have a small concern that this might cause a behavior change in the case where you have a block already sitting on the list when the testlock request comes in, but that looks like it doesn't really work properly anyway. I think it's best to just pass that down to vfs_test_lock and let the filesystem report that instead of trying to infer what's going on with the lock by looking at an existing block. Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Reviewed-by: Kinglong Mee

locks: Copy fl_lmops information for conflock in locks_copy_conflock()

2014-09-09T20:01:09Z

Commit d5b9026a67 ([PATCH] knfsd: locks: flag NFSv4-owned locks) using fl_lmops field in file_lock for checking nfsd4 lockowner. But, commit 1a747ee0cc (locks: don't call ->copy_lock methods on return of conflicting locks) causes the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL. Also, commit 0996905f93 (lockd: posix_test_lock() should not call locks_copy_lock()) caused the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL too. Make sure copy the private information by fl_copy_lock() in struct file_lock_operations, merge __locks_copy_lock() to fl_copy_lock(). Jeff advice, "Set fl_lmops on conflocks, but don't set fl_ops. fl_ops are superfluous, since they are callbacks into the filesystem. There should be no need to bother the filesystem at all with info in a conflock. But, lock _ownership_ matters for conflocks and that's indicated by the fl_lmops. So you really do want to copy the fl_lmops for conflocks I think." v5: add missing calling of locks_release_private() in nlmsvc_testlock() v4: only copy fl_lmops for conflock, don't copy fl_ops Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton

locks: Remove unused conf argument from lm_grant

2014-09-09T20:01:06Z

This argument is always NULL so don't pass it around. [jlayton: remove dependencies on previous patches in series] Signed-off-by: Joe Perches Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton

lockd: send correct lock when granting a delayed lock.

2014-02-13T19:55:02Z

If an NFS client attempts to get a lock (using NLM) and the lock is not available, the server will remember the request and when the lock becomes available it will send a GRANT request to the client to provide the lock. If the client already held an adjacent lock, the GRANT callback will report the union of the existing and new locks, which can confuse the client. This happens because __posix_lock_file (called by vfs_lock_file) updates the passed-in file_lock structure when adjacent or over-lapping locks are found. To avoid this problem we take a copy of the two fields that can be changed (fl_start and fl_end) before the call and restore them afterwards. An alternate would be to allocate a 'struct file_lock', initialise it, use locks_copy_lock() to take a copy, then locks_release_private() after the vfs_lock_file() call. But that is a lot more work. Reported-by: Olaf Kirch Signed-off-by: NeilBrown Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields -- v1 had a couple of issues (large on-stack struct and didn't really work properly). This version is much better tested. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields