kernel/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_rpmsg.c, branch linux-6.9.y

platform/chrome: correct cros_ec_prepare_tx() usage

2022-05-16T02:01:51Z

cros_ec_prepare_tx() returns either: - >= 0 for number of prepared bytes. - < 0 for -errno. Correct the comment and make sure all callers check the return code. Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220513044143.1045728-3-tzungbi@kernel.org

platform/chrome: cros_ec: Call interrupt bottom half in ISH or RPMSG mode

2021-01-22T07:50:27Z

Call the same bottom half for all EC protocols (threaded code). Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210122054637.1422289-2-gwendal@chromium.org

platform/chrome: cros_ec_rpmsg: Document missing struct parameters

2020-06-30T09:41:25Z

Kerneldoc expects all kernel structure member to be documented. Fixes the following W=1 level warnings: cros_ec_rpmsg.c:49: warning: Function parameter or member 'ept' not described in 'cros_ec_rpmsg' cros_ec_rpmsg.c:49: warning: Function parameter or member 'has_pending_host_event' not described in 'cros_ec_rpmsg' cros_ec_rpmsg.c:49: warning: Function parameter or member 'probe_done' not described in 'cros_ec_rpmsg' Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou

platform/chrome: cros_ec_rpmsg: Fix race with host event

2020-03-02T10:04:04Z

Host event can be sent by remoteproc by any time, and cros_ec_rpmsg_callback would be called after cros_ec_rpmsg_create_ept. But the cros_ec_device is initialized after that, which cause host event handler to use cros_ec_device that are not initialized properly yet. Fix this by don't schedule host event handler before cros_ec_register returns. Instead, remember that we have a pending host event, and schedule host event handler after cros_ec_register. Fixes: 71cddb7097e2 ("platform/chrome: cros_ec_rpmsg: Fix race with host command when probe failed.") Signed-off-by: Pi-Hsun Shih Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra

platform/chrome: cros_ec: Match implementation with headers

2020-02-03T16:14:50Z

The 'cros_ec' core driver is the common interface for the cros_ec transport drivers to do the shared operations to register, unregister, suspend, resume and handle_event. The interface is provided by including the header 'include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h', however, instead of have the implementation of these functions in cros_ec_proto.c, it is in 'cros_ec.c', which is a different kernel module. Apart from being a bad practice, this can induce confusions allowing the users of the cros_ec protocol to call these functions. The register, unregister, suspend, resume and handle_event functions *should* only be called by the different transport drivers (i2c, spi, lpc, etc.), so make this a bit less confusing by moving these functions from the public in-kernel space to a private include in platform/chrome, and then, the interface for cros_ec module and for the cros_ec_proto module is clean. Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra Signed-off-by: Benson Leung

platform/chrome: cros_ec: handle MKBP more events flag

2019-11-21T10:23:15Z

The ChromeOS EC has support for signaling to the host that a single IRQ can serve multiple MKBP (Matrix KeyBoard Protocol) events. Doing this serves an optimization purpose, as it minimizes the number of round-trips into the interrupt handling machinery, and it proves beneficial to sensor timestamping as it keeps the desired synchronization of event times between the two processors. This patch adds kernel support for this EC feature, allowing the ec_irq to loop until all events have been served. Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Acked-by: Lee Jones Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra

platform/chrome: cros_ec_rpmsg: Fix race with host command when probe failed

2019-09-12T14:20:50Z

Since the rpmsg_endpoint is created before probe is called, it's possible that a host event is received during cros_ec_register, and there would be some pending work in the host_event_work workqueue while cros_ec_register is called. If cros_ec_register fails, when the leftover work in host_event_work run, the ec_dev from the drvdata of the rpdev could be already set to NULL, causing kernel crash when trying to run cros_ec_get_next_event. Fix this by creating the rpmsg_endpoint by ourself, and when cros_ec_register fails (or on remove), destroy the endpoint first (to make sure there's no more new calls to cros_ec_rpmsg_callback), and then cancel all works in the host_event_work workqueue. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 2de89fd98958 ("platform/chrome: cros_ec: Add EC host command support using rpmsg") Signed-off-by: Pi-Hsun Shih Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra

Merge tag 'ib-mfd-extcon-hid-i2c-iio-input-media-chrome-power-pwm-rtc-sound-v5.4' into chrome-platform/for-next

2019-09-02T17:02:02Z

Immutable branch between MFD, Extcon, HID, I2C, IIO, Input, Chrome, Power, PWM, RTC and Sound to allow picking patches that depends on the series that moves some code from the MFD subsystem to platform/chrome. Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra

mfd / platform: cros_ec: Reorganize platform and mfd includes

2019-09-02T10:33:42Z

There is a bit of mess between cros-ec mfd includes and platform includes. For example, we have a linux/mfd/cros_ec.h include that exports the interface implemented in platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c. Or we have a linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h file that is non related to the multifunction device (in the sense that is not exporting any function of the mfd device). This causes crossed includes between mfd and platform/chrome subsystems and makes the code difficult to read, apart from creating 'curious' situations where a platform/chrome driver includes a linux/mfd/cros_ec.h file just to get the exported functions that are implemented in another platform/chrome driver. In order to have a better separation on what the cros-ec multifunction driver does and what the cros-ec core provides move and rework the affected includes doing: - Move cros_ec_commands.h to include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h - Get rid of the parts that are implemented in the platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c driver from include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h to a new file include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h - Update all the drivers with the new includes, so - Drivers that only need to know about the protocol include - linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h - linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h - Drivers that need to know about the cros-ec mfd device also include - linux/mfd/cros_ec.h Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko Acked-by: Mark Brown Acked-by: Wolfram Sang Acked-by: Neil Armstrong Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov Acked-by: Sebastian Reichel Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou Series changes: 3 - Fix dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'struct cros_ec_dev' (lkp) Signed-off-by: Lee Jones

mfd / platform: cros_ec: Handle chained ECs as platform devices

2019-09-02T10:32:57Z

An MFD is a device that contains several sub-devices (cells). For instance, the ChromeOS EC fits in this description as usually contains a charger and can have other devices with different functions like a Real-Time Clock, an Audio codec, a Real-Time Clock, ... If you look at the driver, though, we're doing something odd. We have two MFD cros-ec drivers where one of them (cros-ec-core) instantiates another MFD driver as sub-driver (cros-ec-dev), and the latest instantiates the different sub-devices (Real-Time Clock, Audio codec, etc). MFD ------------------------------------------ cros-ec-core |___ mfd-cellA (cros-ec-dev) | |__ mfd-cell0 | |__ mfd-cell1 | |__ ... | |___ mfd-cellB (cros-ec-dev) |__ mfd-cell0 |__ mfd-cell1 |__ ... The problem that was trying to solve is to describe some kind of topology for the case where we have an EC (cros-ec) chained with another EC (cros-pd). Apart from that this extends the bounds of what MFD was designed to do we might be interested on have other kinds of topology that can't be implemented in that way. Let's prepare the code to move the cros-ec-core part from MFD to platform/chrome as this is clearly a platform specific thing non-related to a MFD device. platform/chrome | MFD ------------------------------------------ | cros-ec ________|___ cros-ec-dev | |__ mfd-cell0 | |__ mfd-cell1 | |__ ... | cros-pd ________|___ cros-ec-dev | |__ mfd-cell0 | |__ mfd-cell1 | |__ ... Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou Signed-off-by: Lee Jones