kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c, branch linux-4.17.y

drm/msm: add sudo flag to submit ioctl

2018-02-20T15:41:20Z

This flags cause cmdstream to be executed from the ringbuffer (RB) instead of IB1. Normally not something you'd ever want to do, but it is super useful for firmware debugging. Hidden behind CAP_SYS_RAWIO and a default=n kconfig option which depends on EXPERT (and has a suitably scary warning), to prevent it from being used on accident. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark

drm/msm: preserve IOVAs in submit's bo table

2017-10-28T17:59:18Z

We need this if we want to dump the submit after cleanup (ie. from hang or fault). But in the backoff/unpin case we want to clear them. So add a flag so we can skip clearing the IOVAs in at cleanup. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark

drm/msm: Removed unused struct_mutex_task

2017-10-28T15:01:39Z

Recent changes to locking have rendered struct_mutex_task unused. Unused since 0e08270a1f01. Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse Signed-off-by: Rob Clark

drm/msm: Support multiple ringbuffers

2017-10-28T15:01:36Z

Add the infrastructure to support the idea of multiple ringbuffers. Assign each ringbuffer an id and use that as an index for the various ring specific operations. The biggest delta is to support legacy fences. Each fence gets its own sequence number but the legacy functions expect to use a unique integer. To handle this we return a unique identifier for each submission but map it to a specific ring/sequence under the covers. Newer users use a dma_fence pointer anyway so they don't care about the actual sequence ID or ring. The actual mechanics for multiple ringbuffers are very target specific so this code just allows for the possibility but still only defines one ringbuffer for each target family. Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse Signed-off-by: Rob Clark

drm/msm: Add per-instance submit queues

2017-10-28T15:01:35Z

Currently the behavior of a command stream is provided by the user application during submission and the application is expected to internally maintain the settings for each 'context' or 'rendering queue' and specify the correct ones. This works okay for simple cases but as applications become more complex we will want to set context specific flags and do various permission checks to allow certain contexts to enable additional privileges. Add kernel-side submit queues to be analogous to 'contexts' or 'rendering queues' on the application side. Each file descriptor instance will maintain its own list of queues. Queues cannot be shared between file descriptors. For backwards compatibility context id '0' is defined as a default context specifying no priority and no special flags. This is intended to be the usual configuration for 99% of applications so that a garden variety application can function correctly without creating a queue. Only those applications requiring the specific benefit of different queues need create one. Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse Signed-off-by: Rob Clark

drm/msm: fix _NO_IMPLICIT fencing case

2017-10-28T14:54:25Z

We need to call reservation_object_reserve_shared() in both cases, but this wasn't happening in the _NO_IMPLICIT submit case. Fixes: f0a42bb ("drm/msm: submit support for in-fences") Reported-by: Jordan Crouse Signed-off-by: Rob Clark

mm: treewide: remove GFP_TEMPORARY allocation flag

2017-09-14T01:53:16Z

GFP_TEMPORARY was introduced by commit e12ba74d8ff3 ("Group short-lived and reclaimable kernel allocations") along with __GFP_RECLAIMABLE. It's primary motivation was to allow users to tell that an allocation is short lived and so the allocator can try to place such allocations close together and prevent long term fragmentation. As much as this sounds like a reasonable semantic it becomes much less clear when to use the highlevel GFP_TEMPORARY allocation flag. How long is temporary? Can the context holding that memory sleep? Can it take locks? It seems there is no good answer for those questions. The current implementation of GFP_TEMPORARY is basically GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RECLAIMABLE which in itself is tricky because basically none of the existing caller provide a way to reclaim the allocated memory. So this is rather misleading and hard to evaluate for any benefits. I have checked some random users and none of them has added the flag with a specific justification. I suspect most of them just copied from other existing users and others just thought it might be a good idea to use without any measuring. This suggests that GFP_TEMPORARY just motivates for cargo cult usage without any reasoning. I believe that our gfp flags are quite complex already and especially those with highlevel semantic should be clearly defined to prevent from confusion and abuse. Therefore I propose dropping GFP_TEMPORARY and replace all existing users to simply use GFP_KERNEL. Please note that SLAB users with shrinkers will still get __GFP_RECLAIMABLE heuristic and so they will be placed properly for memory fragmentation prevention. I can see reasons we might want some gfp flag to reflect shorterm allocations but I propose starting from a clear semantic definition and only then add users with proper justification. This was been brought up before LSF this year by Matthew [1] and it turned out that GFP_TEMPORARY really doesn't have a clear semantic. It seems to be a heuristic without any measured advantage for most (if not all) its current users. The follow up discussion has revealed that opinions on what might be temporary allocation differ a lot between developers. So rather than trying to tweak existing users into a semantic which they haven't expected I propose to simply remove the flag and start from scratch if we really need a semantic for short term allocations. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170118054945.GD18349@bombadil.infradead.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix typo] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] [sfr@canb.auug.org.au: drm/i915: fix up] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170816144703.378d4f4d@canb.auug.org.au Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170728091904.14627-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell Acked-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Neil Brown Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

drm/msm: args->fence should be args->flags

2017-08-01T23:11:28Z

Fix a typo in msm_ioctl_gem_submit - check args->flags for the MSM_SUBMIT_NO_IMPLICIT flag instead of args->fence. Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse Signed-off-by: Rob Clark

drm/msm: fix an integer overflow test

2017-08-01T20:23:55Z

We recently added an integer overflow check but it needs an additional tweak to work properly on 32 bit systems. The problem is that we're doing the right hand side of the assignment as type unsigned long so the max it will have an integer overflow instead of being larger than SIZE_MAX. That means the "sz > SIZE_MAX" condition is never true even on 32 bit systems. We need to first cast it to u64 and then do the math. Fixes: 4a630fadbb29 ("drm/msm: Fix potential buffer overflow issue") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Acked-by: Jordan Crouse Signed-off-by: Rob Clark

drm/msm: Fix potential buffer overflow issue

2017-06-19T23:58:57Z

In function submit_create, if nr_cmds or nr_bos is assigned with negative value, the allocated buffer may be small than intended. Using this buffer will lead to buffer overflow issue. Signed-off-by: Kasin Li Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse Signed-off-by: Rob Clark