kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c, branch linux-4.17.y

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

2017-11-02T10:10:55Z

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI: Switch to use generic guid_t in acpi_evaluate_dsm()

2017-06-07T10:20:49Z

acpi_evaluate_dsm() and friends take a pointer to a raw buffer of 16 bytes. Instead we convert them to use guid_t type. At the same time we convert current users. acpi_str_to_uuid() becomes useless after the conversion and it's safe to get rid of it. Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Borislav Petkov Acked-by: Dan Williams Cc: Amir Goldstein Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula Acked-by: Jani Nikula Cc: Ben Skeggs Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires Acked-by: Joerg Roedel Acked-by: Adrian Hunter Cc: Yisen Zhuang Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas Acked-by: Felipe Balbi Acked-by: Mathias Nyman Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus Acked-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig

drm/i915: Drop unnecessary #include

2015-10-13T08:18:38Z

Commit 599bbb9de0fe ("drm/i915: i915 cannot provide switcher services.") removed all remaining vga_switcheroo symbols from intel_acpi.c but left the include. Drop it. Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: Spell vga_switcheroo consistently

2015-09-22T15:10:52Z

Currently everyone and their dog has their own favourite spelling for vga_switcheroo. This makes it hard to grep dmesg for log entries relating to vga_switcheroo. It also makes it hard to find related source files in the tree. vga_switcheroo.c uses pr_fmt "vga_switcheroo". Use that everywhere. Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter

Merge branch 'acpi-dsm'

2014-01-12T22:45:52Z

* acpi-dsm: ACPI / extlog: replace open-coded _DSM code with helper functions ACPI / nouveau: replace open-coded _DSM code with helper functions nouveau / ACPI: fix memory leak in ACPI _DSM related code ACPI / i915: replace open-coded _DSM code with helper functions ACPI / i2c-hid: replace open-coded _DSM code with helper functions ACPI / TPM: detect PPI features by checking availability of _DSM functions ACPI / TPM: replace open-coded _DSM code with helper functions ACPI / TPM: match node name instead of full path when searching for TPM device PCI / pci-label: treat PCI label with index 0 as valid label ACPI / PCI: replace open-coded _DSM code with helper functions PCI / pci-label: release allocated ACPI object on error recovery path ACPI: introduce helper interfaces for _DSM method

ACPI / i915: replace open-coded _DSM code with helper functions

2014-01-05T15:07:15Z

Use helper functions to simplify _DSM related code in i915 driver. Function intel_dsm() is used to check functions supported by ACPI _DSM method, but it has strange check for special value 0x80000002. After digging into nouveau driver, I think the check is copied from nouveau driver and is useless for i915 driver, so remove it. Acked-by: Daniel Vetter Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI: Clean up inclusions of ACPI header files

2013-12-07T00:03:14Z

Replace direct inclusions of , and , which are incorrect, with inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't necessary. First of all, , and should not be included directly from any files that are built for CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds. For CONFIG_ACPI set, includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case. Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always have to be met. Namely, it is required that be included prior to so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the latter depends on are always there. And which provides basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds. That also is taken care of including as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Matthew Garrett Cc: Tony Luck Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas (drivers/pci stuff) Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk (Xen stuff) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI: Eliminate the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro

2013-11-14T22:17:21Z

Since DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() is now literally identical to ACPI_HANDLE(), replace it with the latter everywhere and drop its definition from include/acpi.h. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

i915: intel_acpi: convert acpi_get_handle() to acpi_has_method()

2013-09-23T23:37:55Z

acpi_has_method() is a new ACPI API introduced to check the existence of an ACPI control method. It can be used to replace acpi_get_handle() in the case that 1. the calling function doesn't need the ACPI handle of the control method. and 2. the calling function doesn't care the reason why the method is unavailable. Convert acpi_get_handle() to acpi_has_method() in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c in this patch. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui Acked-by: Daniel Vetter Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

i915: fix ACPI _DSM warning

2013-08-05T17:04:05Z

Since commit 29a241c (ACPICA: Add argument typechecking for all predefined ACPI names), _DSM parameters are validated which trigger the following warning: ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95) ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95) ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95) ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95) As the Intel _DSM method seems to ignore this parameter, let's comply to the ACPI spec and use a Package instead. Signed-off-by: Peter Wu Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32602 Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter