kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c, branch linux-4.17.y

Backmerge tag 'v4.16-rc7' into drm-next

2018-03-28T04:30:41Z

Linux 4.16-rc7 This was requested by Daniel, and things were getting a bit hard to reconcile, most of the conflicts were trivial though.

drm/i915: Only call tasklet_kill() on the first prepare_reset

2018-03-16T12:35:35Z

tasklet_kill() will spin waiting for the current tasklet to be executed. However, if tasklet_disable() has been called, then the tasklet is never executed but permanently put back onto the runlist until tasklet_enable() is called. Ergo, we cannot use tasklet_kill() inside a disable/enable pair. This is the case when we call set-wedge from inside i915_reset(), and another request was submitted to us concurrent to the reset. Fixes: 963ddd63c314 ("drm/i915: Suspend submission tasklets around wedging") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Mika Kuoppala Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 68ad361285a9cc73b259f59adbaafde196c15987) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen

drm/i915: Wrap engine->schedule in RCU locks for set-wedge protection

2018-03-16T12:35:31Z

Similar to the staging around handling of engine->submit_request, we need to stop adding to the execlists->queue prior to calling engine->cancel_requests. cancel_requests will move requests from the queue onto the timeline, so if we add a request onto the queue after that point, it will be lost. Fixes: af7a8ffad9c5 ("drm/i915: Use rcu instead of stop_machine in set_wedged") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Mika Kuoppala Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 47650db02dd52267953df81438c93cf8a0eb0e5e) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen

drm/i915: Only prune fences after wait-for-all

2018-03-12T18:24:44Z

Currently, we only allow ourselves to prune the fences so long as all the waits completed (i.e. all the fences we checked were signaled), and that the reservation snapshot did not change across the wait. However, if we only waited for a subset of the reservation object, i.e. just waiting for the last writer to complete as opposed to all readers as well, then we would erroneously conclude we could prune the fences as indeed although all of our waits were successful, they did not represent the totality of the reservation object. v2: We only need to check the shared fences due to construction (i.e. all of the shared fences will be later than the exclusive fence, if any). Fixes: e54ca9774777 ("drm/i915: Remove completed fences after a wait") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Cc: Matthew Auld Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307171303.29466-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit fa73055b8442c97b3ba7cd0aa57cd2ad32124201) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi

drm/i915: Suspend submission tasklets around wedging

2018-03-06T00:08:31Z

After staring hard at sequences like [ 28.199013] systemd-1 2..s. 26062228us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=0 [0?], tail=1 [1?] [ 28.199095] systemd-1 2..s. 26062229us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[1]: status=0x00000018:0x00000000, active=0x1 [ 28.199177] systemd-1 2..s. 26062230us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=0.1, seqno=3, prio=-1024 [ 28.199258] systemd-1 2..s. 26062231us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 completed ctx=0 [ 28.199340] gem_eio-829 1..s1 26066853us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]: ctx=1.1, seqno=1, prio=0 [ 28.199421] -0 2..s. 26066863us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=1 [1?], tail=2 [2?] [ 28.199503] -0 2..s. 26066865us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[2]: status=0x00000001:0x00000000, active=0x1 [ 28.199585] gem_eio-829 1..s1 26067077us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[1]: ctx=3.1, seqno=2, prio=0 [ 28.199667] gem_eio-829 1..s1 26067078us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]: ctx=1.2, seqno=1, prio=0 [ 28.199749] -0 2..s. 26067084us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=2 [2?], tail=3 [3?] [ 28.199830] -0 2..s. 26067085us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[3]: status=0x00008002:0x00000001, active=0x1 [ 28.199912] -0 2..s. 26067086us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=1.2, seqno=1, prio=0 [ 28.199994] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246084us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=3 [3?], tail=4 [4?] [ 28.200096] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246088us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[4]: status=0x00000014:0x00000001, active=0x5 [ 28.200178] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246089us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=0.0, seqno=0, prio=0 [ 28.200260] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246127us : execlists_submission_tasklet: execlists_submission_tasklet:886 GEM_BUG_ON(buf[2 * head + 1] != port->context_id) the conclusion is that the only place where the ports are reset to zero, is from engine->cancel_requests called during i915_gem_set_wedged(). The race is horrible as it results from calling set-wedged on active HW (the GPU reset failed) and as such we need to be careful as the HW state changes beneath us. Fortunately, it's the same scary conditions as affect normal reset, so we can reuse the same machinery to disable state tracking as we clobber it. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104945 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Mika Kuoppala Cc: Michel Thierry Fixes: af7a8ffad9c5 ("drm/i915: Use rcu instead of stop_machine in set_wedged") Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302113324.23189-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 963ddd63c314e9b5d9cd999873d473a93aed5380) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi

drm/i915/uc: Introduce intel_uc_suspend|resume

2018-03-02T23:11:12Z

We want to use higher level 'uc' functions as the main entry points to the GuC/HuC code to hide some details and keep code layered. While here, move call to disable_guc_interrupts after sending suspend action to the GuC to allow it work also with CTB as comm mechanism. v2: update commit msg (Sagar) Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble Cc: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302111550.21328-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

drm/i915: Suspend submission tasklets around wedging

2018-03-02T23:11:11Z

drm/i915: Replace open-coded wait-for loop

2018-03-01T17:42:58Z

Now that we can pass arbitrary commands into the base __wait_for() macro, we can reimplement the open-coded wait-for inside i915_gem_idle_work_handler() using the new macro. This means that instead of using ktime, we now use jiffies, and benefit from the exponential sleep backoff that allows a fast response if the HW settles quickly. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Mika Kuoppala Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180301103338.5380-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

drm/i915: Rename drm_i915_gem_request to i915_request

2018-02-21T20:57:22Z

We want to de-emphasize the link between the request (dependency, execution and fence tracking) from GEM and so rename the struct from drm_i915_gem_request to i915_request. That is we may implement the GEM user interface on top of requests, but they are an abstraction for tracking execution rather than an implementation detail of GEM. (Since they are not tied to HW, we keep the i915 prefix as opposed to intel.) In short, the spatch: @@ @@ - struct drm_i915_gem_request + struct i915_request A corollary to contracting the type name, we also harmonise on using 'rq' shorthand for local variables where space if of the essence and repetition makes 'request' unwieldy. For globals and struct members, 'request' is still much preferred for its clarity. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Cc: Mika Kuoppala Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Michał Winiarski Cc: Michal Wajdeczko Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180221095636.6649-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen

drm/i915: Move the policy for placement of the GGTT vma into the caller

2018-02-20T19:03:59Z

Currently we make the unilateral decision inside i915_gem_object_pin_to_display() where the VMA should resided (inside the fence and mappable region or above?). This is not our decision to make as it impacts on how the display engine can use the resulting scanout object, and it would rather instruct us where to place the VMA so that it can enable the features it wants. As such, make the pin flags an argument to i915_gem_object_pin_to_display() and control them from intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj() Whilst taking control of the mapping for ourselves, start tracking how we use it to avoid trying to free a fence we never claimed: <3>[ 227.151869] GEM_BUG_ON(vma->fence->pin_count <= 0) <4>[ 227.152064] ------------[ cut here ]------------ <2>[ 227.152068] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h:391! <4>[ 227.152084] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI <0>[ 227.152092] Dumping ftrace buffer: <0>[ 227.152099] (ftrace buffer empty) <4>[ 227.152102] Modules linked in: i915 snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_codec_generic coretemp snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core snd_pcm lpc_ich e1000e mei_me mei prime_numbers <4>[ 227.152131] CPU: 1 PID: 1587 Comm: kworker/u16:49 Tainted: G U 4.16.0-rc1-gbab67b2f6177-kasan_7+ #1 <4>[ 227.152134] Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 755 /0PU052, BIOS A08 02/19/2008 <4>[ 227.152236] Workqueue: events_unbound intel_atomic_commit_work [i915] <4>[ 227.152292] RIP: 0010:intel_unpin_fb_vma+0x23a/0x2a0 [i915] <4>[ 227.152295] RSP: 0018:ffff88005aad7b68 EFLAGS: 00010286 <4>[ 227.152300] RAX: 0000000000000026 RBX: ffff88005c359580 RCX: 0000000000000000 <4>[ 227.152304] RDX: 0000000000000026 RSI: ffffffff8707d840 RDI: ffffed000b55af63 <4>[ 227.152307] RBP: ffff880056817e58 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 <4>[ 227.152311] R10: ffff88005aad7b88 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8800568184d0 <4>[ 227.152314] R13: ffff880065b5ab08 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 <4>[ 227.152318] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88006ac40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 <4>[ 227.152322] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 <4>[ 227.152325] CR2: 00007f5fb25550a8 CR3: 0000000068c78000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 <4>[ 227.152328] Call Trace: <4>[ 227.152385] intel_cleanup_plane_fb+0x6b/0xd0 [i915] <4>[ 227.152395] drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes+0x166/0x280 <4>[ 227.152452] intel_atomic_commit_tail+0x159d/0x3380 [i915] <4>[ 227.152463] ? process_one_work+0x66e/0x1460 <4>[ 227.152516] ? skl_update_crtcs+0x9c0/0x9c0 [i915] <4>[ 227.152523] ? lock_acquire+0x13d/0x390 <4>[ 227.152527] ? lock_acquire+0x13d/0x390 <4>[ 227.152534] process_one_work+0x71a/0x1460 <4>[ 227.152540] ? __schedule+0x815/0x1e20 <4>[ 227.152547] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2b0/0x2b0 <4>[ 227.152553] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xa/0x40 <4>[ 227.152559] worker_thread+0xdf/0xf60 <4>[ 227.152569] ? process_one_work+0x1460/0x1460 <4>[ 227.152573] kthread+0x2cf/0x3c0 <4>[ 227.152578] ? _kthread_create_on_node+0xa0/0xa0 <4>[ 227.152583] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 <4>[ 227.152591] Code: c6 00 11 86 c0 48 c7 c7 e0 bd 85 c0 e8 60 e7 a9 c4 0f ff e9 1f fe ff ff 48 c7 c6 40 10 86 c0 48 c7 c7 e0 ca 85 c0 e8 2b 95 bd c4 <0f> 0b 48 89 ef e8 4c 44 e8 c4 e9 ef fd ff ff e8 42 44 e8 c4 e9 <1>[ 227.152720] RIP: intel_unpin_fb_vma+0x23a/0x2a0 [i915] RSP: ffff88005aad7b68 v2: i915_vma_pin_fence() is a no-op if a fence isn't required, so check vma->fence as well. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Cc: Ville Syrjälä Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180220134208.24988-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk