kernel/arch, branch linux-3.3.y

MCE: Fix vm86 handling for 32bit mce handler

2012-06-01T07:15:55Z

commit a129a7c84582629741e5fa6f40026efcd7a65bd4 upstream. When running on 32bit the mce handler could misinterpret vm86 mode as ring 0. This can affect whether it does recovery or not; it was possible to panic when recovery was actually possible. Fix this by always forcing vm86 to look like ring 3. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Tony Luck Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ARM: 7409/1: Do not call flush_cache_user_range with mmap_sem held

2012-06-01T07:15:54Z

commit 435a7ef52db7d86e67a009b36cac1457f8972391 upstream. We can't be holding the mmap_sem while calling flush_cache_user_range because the flush can fault. If we fault on a user address, the page fault handler will try to take mmap_sem again. Since both places acquire the read lock, most of the time it succeeds. However, if another thread tries to acquire the write lock on the mmap_sem (e.g. mmap) in between the call to flush_cache_user_range and the fault, the down_read in do_page_fault will deadlock. [will: removed drop of vma parameter as already queued by rmk (7365/1)] Acked-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Dima Zavin Signed-off-by: John Stultz Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Russell King Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ARM: 7365/1: drop unused parameter from flush_cache_user_range

2012-06-01T07:15:54Z

commit 4542b6a0fa6b48d9ae6b41c1efeb618b7a221b2a upstream. vma isn't used and flush_cache_user_range isn't a standard macro that is used on several archs with the same prototype. In fact only unicore32 has a macro with the same name (with an identical implementation and no in-tree users). This is a part of a patch proposed by Dima Zavin (with Message-id: 1272439931-12795-1-git-send-email-dima@android.com) that didn't get accepted. Cc: Dima Zavin Acked-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Russell King Cc: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

tile: fix bug where fls(0) was not returning 0

2012-06-01T07:15:53Z

commit 9f1d62bed7f015d11b9164078b7fea433b474114 upstream. This is because __builtin_clz(0) returns 64 for the "undefined" case of 0, since the builtin just does a right-shift 32 and "clz" instruction. So, use the alpha approach of casting to u32 and using __builtin_clzll(). Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/mce: Fix check for processor context when machine check was taken.

2012-06-01T07:15:53Z

commit 875e26648cf9b6db9d8dc07b7959d7c61fb3f49c upstream. Linus pointed out that there was no value is checking whether m->ip was zero - because zero is a legimate value. If we have a reliable (or faked in the VM86 case) "m->cs" we can use it to tell whether we were in user mode or kernelwhen the machine check hit. Reported-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Tony Luck Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86, relocs: Add jiffies and jiffies_64 to the relative whitelist

2012-06-01T07:15:53Z

commit ea17e7414bc62e8d3bde8d08e3df1d921c518c17 upstream. The symbol jiffies is created in the linker script as an alias to jiffies_64. Unfortunately this is done outside any section, and apparently GNU ld 2.21 doesn't carry the section with it, so we end up with an absolute symbol and therefore a broken kernel. Add jiffies and jiffies_64 to the whitelist. The most disturbing bit with this discovery is that it shows that we have had multiple linker bugs in this area crossing multiple generations, and have been silently building bad kernels for some time. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120524171604.0d98284f3affc643e9714470@canb.auug.org.au Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86-32, relocs: Whitelist more symbols for ld bug workaround

2012-06-01T07:15:52Z

commit fd952815307f0f272bf49fd364a7fd2f9992bc42 upstream. As noted in checkin: a3e854d95 x86, relocs: Workaround for binutils 2.22.52.0.1 section bug ld version 2.22.52.0.[12] can incorrectly promote relative symbols to absolute, if the output section they appear in is otherwise empty. Since checkin: 6520fe55 x86, realmode: 16-bit real-mode code support for relocs tool we actually check for this and error out rather than silently creating a kernel which will malfunction if relocated. Ingo found a configuration in which __start_builtin_fw triggered the warning. Go through the linker script sources and look for more symbols that could plausibly get bogusly promoted to absolute, and add them to the whitelist. In general, if the following error triggers: Invalid absolute R_386_32 relocation: ... then we should verify that is really meant to be relocated, and add it and any related symbols manually to the S_REL regexp. Please note that 6520fe55 does not introduce the error, only the check for the error -- without 6520fe55 this version of ld will simply produce a corrupt kernel if CONFIG_RELOCATABLE is set on x86-32. Reported-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86, relocs: Build clean fix

2012-06-01T07:15:52Z

commit b2d668da9307c4c163dd603d2bb3cadb10f9fd37 upstream. relocs was not cleaned up when "make clean" is issued. This patch fixes the issue. Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1337622684-6834-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86, relocs: When printing an error, say relative or absolute

2012-06-01T07:15:52Z

commit 24ab82bd9bf18f3efc69a131d73577940941e1b7 upstream. When the relocs tool throws an error, let the error message say if it is an absolute or relative symbol. This should make it a lot more clear what action the programmer needs to take and should help us find the reason if additional symbol bugs show up. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86, relocs: Workaround for binutils 2.22.52.0.1 section bug

2012-06-01T07:15:52Z

commit a3e854d95a76862cd37937e0b0438f540536771a upstream. GNU ld 2.22.52.0.1 has a bug that it blindly changes symbols from section-relative to absolute if they are in a section of zero length. This turns the symbols __init_begin and __init_end into absolute symbols. Let the relocs program know that those should be treated as relative symbols. Reported-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin Cc: H.J. Lu Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman