kernel/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c, branch linux-5.1.y

powerpc/pseries: Fix oops in hotplug memory notifier

2019-07-26T07:13:06Z

commit 0aa82c482ab2ece530a6f44897b63b274bb43c8e upstream. During post-migration device tree updates, we can oops in pseries_update_drconf_memory() if the source device tree has an ibm,dynamic-memory-v2 property and the destination has a ibm,dynamic_memory (v1) property. The notifier processes an "update" for the ibm,dynamic-memory property but it's really an add in this scenario. So make sure the old property object is there before dereferencing it. Fixes: 2b31e3aec1db ("powerpc/drmem: Add support for ibm, dynamic-memory-v2 property") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.16+ Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

powerpc/pseries: Track LMB nid instead of using device tree

2019-06-15T09:52:59Z

[ Upstream commit b2d3b5ee66f2a04a918cc043cec0c9ed3de58f40 ] When removing memory we need to remove the memory from the node it was added to instead of looking up the node it should be in in the device tree. During testing we have seen scenarios where the affinity for a LMB changes due to a partition migration or PRRN event. In these cases the node the LMB exists in may not match the node the device tree indicates it belongs in. This can lead to a system crash when trying to DLPAR remove the LMB after a migration or PRRN event. The current code looks up the node in the device tree to remove the LMB from, the crash occurs when we try to offline this node and it does not have any data, i.e. node_data[nid] == NULL. 36:mon> e cpu 0x36: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at [c0000001828b7810] pc: c00000000036d08c: try_offline_node+0x2c/0x1b0 lr: c0000000003a14ec: remove_memory+0xbc/0x110 sp: c0000001828b7a90 msr: 800000000280b033 dar: 9a28 dsisr: 40000000 current = 0xc0000006329c4c80 paca = 0xc000000007a55200 softe: 0 irq_happened: 0x01 pid = 76926, comm = kworker/u320:3 36:mon> t [link register ] c0000000003a14ec remove_memory+0xbc/0x110 [c0000001828b7a90] c00000000006a1cc arch_remove_memory+0x9c/0xd0 (unreliable) [c0000001828b7ad0] c0000000003a14e0 remove_memory+0xb0/0x110 [c0000001828b7b20] c0000000000c7db4 dlpar_remove_lmb+0x94/0x160 [c0000001828b7b60] c0000000000c8ef8 dlpar_memory+0x7e8/0xd10 [c0000001828b7bf0] c0000000000bf828 handle_dlpar_errorlog+0xf8/0x160 [c0000001828b7c60] c0000000000bf8cc pseries_hp_work_fn+0x3c/0xa0 [c0000001828b7c90] c000000000128cd8 process_one_work+0x298/0x5a0 [c0000001828b7d20] c000000000129068 worker_thread+0x88/0x620 [c0000001828b7dc0] c00000000013223c kthread+0x1ac/0x1c0 [c0000001828b7e30] c00000000000b45c ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x80 To resolve this we need to track the node a LMB belongs to when it is added to the system so we can remove it from that node instead of the node that the device tree indicates it should belong to. Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

powerpc/pseries: Fix node leak in update_lmb_associativity_index()

2018-12-22T10:04:22Z

In update_lmb_associativity_index() we lookup dr_node using of_find_node_by_path() which takes a reference for us. In the non-error case we forget to drop the reference. Note that find_aa_index() does modify properties of the node, but doesn't need an extra reference held once it's returned. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman

powerpc/fadump: Do not allow hot-remove memory from fadump reserved area.

2018-12-21T00:32:49Z

For fadump to work successfully there should not be any holes in reserved memory ranges where kernel has asked firmware to move the content of old kernel memory in event of crash. Now that fadump uses CMA for reserved area, this memory area is now not protected from hot-remove operations unless it is cma allocated. Hence, fadump service can fail to re-register after the hot-remove operation, if hot-removed memory belongs to fadump reserved region. To avoid this make sure that memory from fadump reserved area is not hot-removable if fadump is registered. However, if user still wants to remove that memory, he can do so by manually stopping fadump service before hot-remove operation. Signed-off-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman

powerpc: Use device_type helpers to access the node type

2018-11-26T11:33:37Z

Remove directly accessing device_node.type pointer and use the accessors instead. This will eventually allow removing the type pointer. Replace the open coded iterating over child nodes with for_each_child_of_node() while we're here. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman

mm/memory_hotplug: make add_memory() take the device_hotplug_lock

2018-10-31T15:54:17Z

add_memory() currently does not take the device_hotplug_lock, however is aleady called under the lock from arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c to synchronize against CPU hot-remove and similar. In general, we should hold the device_hotplug_lock when adding memory to synchronize against online/offline request (e.g. from user space) - which already resulted in lock inversions due to device_lock() and mem_hotplug_lock - see 30467e0b3be ("mm, hotplug: fix concurrent memory hot-add deadlock"). add_memory()/add_memory_resource() will create memory block devices, so this really feels like the right thing to do. Holding the device_hotplug_lock makes sure that a memory block device can really only be accessed (e.g. via .online/.state) from user space, once the memory has been fully added to the system. The lock is not held yet in drivers/xen/balloon.c arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c drivers/s390/char/sclp_cmd.c drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c So, let's either use the locked variants or take the lock. Don't export add_memory_resource(), as it once was exported to be used by XEN, which is never built as a module. If somebody requires it, we also have to export a locked variant (as device_hotplug_lock is never exported). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-3-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Len Brown Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Boris Ostrovsky Cc: Juergen Gross Cc: Nathan Fontenot Cc: John Allen Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Mathieu Malaterre Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU Cc: Balbir Singh Cc: Haiyang Zhang Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Kate Stewart Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Michael Neuling Cc: Philippe Ombredanne Cc: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/memory_hotplug: make remove_memory() take the device_hotplug_lock

2018-10-31T15:54:17Z

Patch series "mm: online/offline_pages called w.o. mem_hotplug_lock", v3. Reading through the code and studying how mem_hotplug_lock is to be used, I noticed that there are two places where we can end up calling device_online()/device_offline() - online_pages()/offline_pages() without the mem_hotplug_lock. And there are other places where we call device_online()/device_offline() without the device_hotplug_lock. While e.g. echo "online" > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/state is fine, e.g. echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/online Will not take the mem_hotplug_lock. However the device_lock() and device_hotplug_lock. E.g. via memory_probe_store(), we can end up calling add_memory()->online_pages() without the device_hotplug_lock. So we can have concurrent callers in online_pages(). We e.g. touch in online_pages() basically unprotected zone->present_pages then. Looks like there is a longer history to that (see Patch #2 for details), and fixing it to work the way it was intended is not really possible. We would e.g. have to take the mem_hotplug_lock in device/base/core.c, which sounds wrong. Summary: We had a lock inversion on mem_hotplug_lock and device_lock(). More details can be found in patch 3 and patch 6. I propose the general rules (documentation added in patch 6): 1. add_memory/add_memory_resource() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. 2. remove_memory() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. This is already documented and holds for all callers. 3. device_online()/device_offline() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. This is already documented and true for now in core code. Other callers (related to memory hotplug) have to be fixed up. 4. mem_hotplug_lock is taken inside of add_memory/remove_memory/ online_pages/offline_pages. To me, this looks way cleaner than what we have right now (and easier to verify). And looking at the documentation of remove_memory, using lock_device_hotplug also for add_memory() feels natural. This patch (of 6): remove_memory() is exported right now but requires the device_hotplug_lock, which is not exported. So let's provide a variant that takes the lock and only export that one. The lock is already held in arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c Apart from that, there are not other users in the tree. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-2-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Len Brown Cc: Rashmica Gupta Cc: Michael Neuling Cc: Balbir Singh Cc: Nathan Fontenot Cc: John Allen Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU Cc: Mathieu Malaterre Cc: Boris Ostrovsky Cc: Haiyang Zhang Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Juergen Gross Cc: Kate Stewart Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Philippe Ombredanne Cc: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

powerpc/pseries/memory-hotplug: Fix return value type of find_aa_index

2018-10-13T11:21:25Z

The variable 'aa_index' is defined as an unsigned value in update_lmb_associativity_index(), but find_aa_index() may return -1 when dlpar_clone_property() fails. So change find_aa_index() to return a bool, which indicates whether 'aa_index' was found or not. Fixes: c05a5a40969e ("powerpc/pseries: Dynamic add entires to associativity lookup array") Signed-off-by: YueHaibing Reviewed-by: Nathan Fontenot nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [mpe: Tweak changelog, rename is_found to just found] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman

powerpc/pseries/memory-hotplug: Only update DT once per memory DLPAR request

2018-09-19T12:08:12Z

The updates to powerpc numa and memory hotplug code now use the in-kernel LMB array instead of the device tree. This change allows the pseries memory DLPAR code to only update the device tree once after successfully handling a DLPAR request. Prior to the in-kernel LMB array, the numa code looked up the affinity for memory being added in the device tree, the code now looks this up in the LMB array. This change means the memory hotplug code can just update the affinity for an LMB in the LMB array instead of updating the device tree. This also provides a savings in kernel memory. When updating the device tree old properties are never free'ed since there is no usecount on properties. This behavior leads to a new copy of the property being allocated every time a LMB is added or removed (i.e. a request to add 100 LMBs creates 100 new copies of the property). With this update only a single new property is created when a DLPAR request completes successfully. Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman

powerpc: Move of_drconf_cell struct to asm/drmem.h

2018-01-16T12:26:29Z

Now that the powerpc code parses dynamic reconfiguration memory LMB information from the LMB array and not the device tree directly we can move the of_drconf_cell struct to drmem.h where it fits better. In addition, the struct is renamed to of_drconf_cell_v1 in anticipation of upcoming support for version 2 of the dynamic reconfiguration property and the members are typed as __be* values to reflect how they exist in the device tree. Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman